MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2909038232 · doi:10.4095/248207

Drift Isopach Map, Ts'ude niline Tu'eyeta Candidate Protected area, Northwest Territories

2009· report· en· W2909038232 sur OpenAlexaffabout
I R Smith, K Lesk-Winfield

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typereport
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueRangeland and Wildlife Management
Établissements canadiensNatural Resources Canada
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIsopach mapGeographyCartographyGeologyGeomorphology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This publication presents a model of interpolated and minimum estimates of drift thickness overlying bedrock of the Ts'ude niline Tu'eyeta Candidate Protected Area. Drift refers to all unconsolidated earth materials, and largely comprises glacial sediments of Late Wisconsinan age (25,000 - 10,000). Understanding the extent and thickness of the regional drift cover is important to studies of landslides, hydrogeology, permafrost and massive ground ice distribution, granular aggregate assessments, and drift geochemical exploration. Data used in the drift isopach model is principally derived from 30,006 seismic shothole drillers' logs (Smith et al., 2007; Smith and Lesk-Winfield, in press). These lithostratigraphic logs were created during geotechnical seismic exploration when holes were drilled to set explosive charges. A secondary source of data, 1216 data points from the borehole geotechnical database of Smith et al. (2005) were also included, as were 52 points from Janicki's (2005) formation top well database. Additionally, 35,277 points were interpolated from published surficial geology maps of Duk-Rodkin (1992, 2002a, b; 2005) and Duk-Rodkin and Hughes (1992a-h, 1993a, b). Based on their respective map legends, polygons of till and colluvial veneer were assigned maximum drift thicknesses of 2 or 3 m, while rock polygons were assigned drift thicknesses of 0 m.The Ts'ude niline Tu'eyeta Candidate Protected Area is characterized by prominent northwest - southeast oriented bands of thick (>14 m) drift oriented parallel or oblique to the Mackenzie River, interspersed with areas of thin drift, particularly in the southern regions where it rises towards the Mackenzie Mountains. In the northern part of the candidate protected area, drift appears to infill a valley that has a geometry suggesting it was a tributary channel of a previously connected preglacial Ontaratue and Ramparts river, that drained southeastward through a valley into a preglacial Mackenzie River. The southeastward and then abruptly northeast flow path of the modern Ontaratue River likely reflects a diversion along an eastward retreating ice margin during deglaciation. Thick packages of drift in the Fort Good Hope area may relate to the infill of former tributary channels or drainage paths of a preglacial Mackenzie River, and are comprised of both till and glaciofluvial sediments. Thick drift cover north of the candidate protected area is largely till (Smith and Lesk-Winfield, in press). Thick deposits along the west and southwest borders of the candidate protected area are considered to be related to ice marginal deposits emplaced along the mountain front during deglaciation. Areas of thin drift in the candidate protected area are largely comprised of till overlying shale bedrock. The abundance of small lakes, ponds, and wetlands in the central Ontaratue and lower Ramparts river areas reflect the impermeability of the clay and fine-silt rich till that underlies this terrain, and the shale bedrock that underlies the drift material. Surface ponding is also likely a reflection of the extensive discontinuous and intermediate discontinuous permafrost and associated high (>15%) to moderate (10-15%) ice contents that characterize the area (Heginbottom, 2000; Smith et al., 2007). As the thickness of permafrost in the area is poorly constrained, it is uncertain whether the thick valley fills operate as sub-surface aquifers, draining into the Mackenzie River. Isolated areas of thick drift east of Fort Good Hope appear to have significant granular aggregate potential (Duk-Rodkin, 1992a; Smith and Lesk-Winfield, 2009). Most of the east, north, and central terrain of the candidate protected area offer little granular aggregate potential; that which does exist is largely comprised of sand-rich deposits (Smith and Lesk-Winfield, 2009). Large, surface gravel, and mixed gravel and sand deposits are found along the lower Gayna and Mountain rivers, both within and outside the proposed boundaries of the candidate protected area. These deposits are associated with a series of glaciofluvial outwash terraces (Duk-Rodkin and Hughes, 1993a), and range in thickness between 5 and 10+ m (Smith and Lesk-Winfield, 2009).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,680
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,637

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0150,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,236
Écart entre enseignants0,224 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2009
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetRangeland and Wildlife ManagementTravaux en français237 207