MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2909907121

Predicting the Removal of Micropollutants in Lake Ontario and Grand River using Ozonation

2019· dissertation· en· W2909907121 sur OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
sabrina bedjera

Notice bibliographique

RevueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2019
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueWater Quality and Pollution Assessment
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Waterloo
Mots-clésEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)EngineeringGeotechnical engineering
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Micropollutants occur at low concentrations (µg/L to ng/L), can have a range of environmental and health effects, and can enter surface water through run-off from fields and wastewater discharge. Surface water is used for drinking water production and therefore, it is crucial to remove any micropollutants during drinking water treatment. Ozonation is an effective treatment process for degrading micropollutants involving the use of ozone (O3) which also decomposes to produce the hydroxyl radical (●OH). The Rct value, a unitless parameter, represents the ratio of ●OH to O3 exposure and is a water characteristic. 
\n
\nThe Rct value is a crucial component of the micropollutant degradation model. However, implementation of this model has often been done under baseline or limited conditions. The primary objective of this thesis was to use this model to predict how effective the ozonation process was for three different drinking water treatment plants for a range of micropollutants and seasonal conditions. Seasonal Rct values were determined from measurements in water samples taken just prior to the ozone contactors of the 3 participating utilities using low and high applied ozone doses (1 and 4 mg/L). Water quality parameters as well as ●OH and O3 decay curves and therefore Rct values were found to vary among the three treatment plants and the seasons. Rct values ranged from 10-8 to 10-9, which were consistent with the literature. Rct values for the 1 mg/L applied ozone dose were more varied among the three treatment plants than Rct values obtained with the 4 mg/L applied ozone dose. Pearson correlation analysis was used to investigate correlations of all water quality parameters and applied ozone dose with the Rct values. Ozone dose had the strongest significant correlation, p<0.05, with the Rct value with a value of 
\n-0.70 while temperature and pH both had moderate correlations. A step-wise linear regression indicated that ozone dose and temperature were important factors to model the Rct value with an R2 value of 0.70.
\n
\nThe micropollutants microcystin-LR (MC-LR) and atrazine were then chosen to validate the micropollutant degradation model representing fast and slow reacting compounds respectively. The validation with atrazine was successful with a better fit for the 1 mg/L applied ozone dose than for the 4 mg/L dose. Temperature modifications improved the fit for the 4 mg/L applied ozone dose, but did not make a difference for the 1 mg/L dose. Early deviations occurred between the simulated and experimental results and were hypothesized to be attributed to the inability to measure ozone degradation in the first phase. 
\nThe Rct value, rate constants, and ozone exposure were then input into the model to simulate micropollutant degradation. Temperature and pH modifications were employed to ensure that the model could be used under a variety of seasonal conditions. The rate constants of O3 and ●OH with the cannabinoids ∆9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) were predicted with quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) models, since they were not available in the literature. Both compounds were found to be fast-reacting with both of the oxidants. Simulations showed that degradation of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX) and atrazine was highest in Lake Ontario, which was likely due to its water quality e.g. lower dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Simulations for the cannabinoids THC and CBD and the cyanotoxins MC-LR, anatoxin-a (ANTX), and cylindrospermopsin (CYN) showed fast and complete removal in all three treatment plants under all seasonal conditions studied. Individual BTEX compounds were degraded according to their rate constants with ozone with benzene having the lowest percent removal and the xylenes having the highest. In an assumed spill scenario, benzene was rarely removed below its regulated level in Canadian drinking water while ethylbenzene was removed in all water sources below the regulated value except for one simulation. Overall, this thesis shows that the micropollutant degradation model can be used to predict how effective the ozonation process is in specific drinking water treatment plants. Seasonality was considered by sampling throughout the year and by employing temperature and pH modifications, which increased the applicability of this model to better simulate real world treatment situations. The use of previously developed QSPR models to predict reaction rate constants of micropollutants makes it possible to apply the micropollutant degradation model to basically any micropollutant of interest to a utility.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,709
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,678

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,217
Écart entre enseignants0,201 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Même sujetWater Quality and Pollution AssessmentTravaux en français237 207