Risk of Death, Relapse or Progression, and Loss of Life Expectancy at Different Progression-Free Survival Milestones in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma involving exclusively the central nervous system (CNS). The majority of PCNSLs are diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL), but treatment and prognosis differ from systemic DLBCL due to differences in biology and the difficulty of delivering effective therapies with high penetration across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). While PCNSL often responds to initial therapy, relapses are common even after achieving a complete remission. The aims of this study were to estimate the risk of death or relapse and the loss of life expectancy in PCNSL after primary treatment with high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) containing regimens. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and for patients reaching pre-defined milestones of progression-free survival (PFS). Data on PCNSL patients were extracted from the nationwide Danish lymphoma register. The inclusion criteria were I) histologically-proven DLBCL morphology, II) involvement restricted to parenchymal or leptomeningeal CNS involvement without ocular involvement, III) treatment protocols containing HD-MTX, and IV) diagnosis between 2000-2017. PFS was defined as the time from diagnosis until death, relapse/progression, or end-of-treatment response assessment for patients with stable or progressive disease at the response assessment. The five-year PFS event probability risk was estimated for all patients and conditional on patients reaching different PFS milestones. The five-year restricted loss of lifetime (5y-RLEL) was defined as the numeric difference in the number of days patients and individuals from a background population are expected to live in the following five year period. This was estimated for all patients and for subsets of patients free of PFS events after one (PFS1), two (PFS2), or three (PFS3) years. Additionally, the results were stratified according to gender, ECOG performance status 0-1/> 1, elevated LDH status, treatment with/without rituximab, and age at diagnosis ≤60/>60 years. The survival of an age- and gender-matched general population was calculated by using life tables from the Human Mortality Database. In total 253 patients were included in the analyses; 60% were male, median age at diagnosis was 66 (range 27 - 85), 46% had an ECOG performance status > 1, and 33% had elevated LDH levels. Consolidation therapy (radiotherapy and/or high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation) was used in 23% of patients and 36% received rituximab in first line. The median follow-up was 6.9 years (range 0.7 - 17.7), the 5-year overall survival was 35% (95% CI 29-42), and the five-year PFS was 28% (95% CI 22-34). Patients reaching PFS1 had a 51% (95% CI 41-61) probability of a PFS event in the following five years (Figure 1A). After the PFS1 milestone, the five-year probability of a PFS event did not change substantially (Figure 1A) and the event probability remained high even after three years of PFS. On average, the PCNSL patients lost 2.2 living years (95% CI 1.9 - 2.4) in the five years after first pathologic diagnosis of PCNSL (Figure 1B). At PFS1, the 5y-RLEL decreased to 1.0 years (95% CI 0.7 - 1.3) (Figure 1B). The achievement of later PFS milestones only led to minor additional decreases in 5y-RLEL (PFS3: 0.7 years [95% CI 0.3 - 1.1]) (Figure 1B). The 5y-RLEL estimates were substantially larger for patients with an ECOG performance status > 1 vs patients with an ECOG performance status ≤ 1 (Figure 1B). Outcome differences between risk factor defined subgroups decreased after PFS1 and later PFS milestones (Figure 1B). The outlook of PCNSL patients treated with HD-MTX-based therapy improves significantly given a progression-free survival of one year, after which baseline adverse risk factors lose prognostic impact over time. However, in contrast to systemic DLBCL, survival does not normalize to the background population even after several years without PFS event. By the time of the ASH, updated results that include patients from the population-based lymphoma database in British Columbia (Canada) will be presented. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».