MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2911226018 · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30454-x

Global, regional, and national burden of epilepsy, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016

2019· article· en· W2911226018 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Ettore Beghi, Giorgia Giussani, Emma Nichols, Foad Abd-Allah, Jemal Abdela, Ahmed Abdelalim, Haftom Niguse Abraha, Mina G Adib, Sutapa Agrawal, Fares Alahdab, Ashish Awasthi, Yohanes Ayele, Miguel A. Barboza, Abate Bekele Belachew, Belete Biadgo, Ali Bijani, Helen Bitew, Félix Carvalho, Yazan Chaiah, Ahmad Daryani, Huyen Phuc, Manisha Dubey, Aman Yesuf Endries, Sharareh Eskandarieh, André Faro, Farshad Farzadfar, Seyed‐Mohammad Fereshtehnejad, Eduarda Fernandes, Daniel Obadare Fijabi, Irina Filip, Florian Fischer, Abadi Kahsu Gebre, Afewerki Gebremeskel Tsadik, Teklu Gebrehiwo Gebremichael, Kebede Embaye Gezae, Maryam Ghasemi‐Kasman, Meaza Girma Degefa, E. V. Gnedovskaya, Tekleberhan B Hagos, Arvin Haj‐Mirzaian, Arya Haj‐Mirzaian, Hamid Yimam Hassen, Simon I Hay, Mihajlo Jakovljević, Amir Kasaeian, Tesfaye Kassa, Yousef Khader, Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Jagdish Khubchandani, Adnan Kısa, Kristopher J Krohn, Chanda Kulkarni, Yirga Legesse Nirayo, Mark T. Mackay, Marek Majdán, Azeem Majeed, Treh Manhertz, Man Mohan Mehndiratta, Tesfa Mekonen, Hagazi Gebre Meles, Getnet Mengistu, Shafiu Mohammed, Mohsen Naghavi, Ali H. Mokdad, Ghulam Mustafa, Seyed Sina Naghibi Irvani, Long Hoang Nguyen, Molly R Nixon, Felix Akpojene Ogbo, Andrew T Olagunju, Tinuke O Olagunju, Mayowa Owolabi, Michael Phillips, Gabriel David Pinilla-Monsalve, Mostafa Qorbani, Amir Radfar, Anwar Rafay, Vafa Rahimi‐Movaghar, Nickolas Reinig, Perminder S. Sachdev, Hosein Safari, Saeed Safari, Saeid Safiri, Mohammad Ali Sahraian, Abdallah M Samy, Shahabeddin Sarvi, Monika Sawhney, Masood Ali Shaikh, Mehdi Sharif, Gagandeep Singh, Mari Smith, Cassandra Szoeke, Rafael Tabarés‐Seisdedos, Mohamad‐Hani Temsah, Omar Temsah, Miguel Tortajada‐Girbés, Bach Xuan Tran, Amanuel Tsegay, Irfan Ullah, Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian, Ronny Westerman, Andrea Sylvia Winkler, Ebrahim M Yimer, Naohiro Yonemoto, Valery L. Feigin, Theo Vos, Christopher J L Murray

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Lancet Neurology · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueEpilepsy research and treatment
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesResearch Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesInstituto de Salud Carlos IIINational Health and Medical Research CouncilHeller School for Social Policy and ManagementUniversidade Federal de SergipeUniversidad Industrial de SantanderMinistério da EducaçãoBahir Dar UniversityShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesAustralian Catholic UniversityMinistarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog RazvojaUniversität BielefeldUniversitair Ziekenhuis AntwerpenTechnische Universität MünchenJohns Hopkins UniversityUniversitetet i OsloTehran University of Medical Sciences and Health ServicesEuropean CommissionMinistério da Educação e CiênciaImperial College LondonGeneralitat ValencianaWestern Sydney UniversityMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadAlborz University of Medical SciencesAin Shams UniversityUniversity College LondonUniversitat de ValènciaUniversity of New South WalesMcMaster UniversityJordan University of Science and TechnologyH. Lundbeck A/SInstitute for Health Metrics and EvaluationDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaTrường Đại học Duy TânKaiser PermanenteShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityMinisterio de Educación, Cultura y DeporteIslamic Azad UniversityMaragheh University of Medical SciencesUniversidad de SantanderAhmadu Bello UniversityAhvaz Jundishapur University of Medical SciencesSaint Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical CollegeUniversity of MemphisKing Saud UniversityBrandeis UniversityAuckland University of Technology, New ZealandMcGill UniversityTulane UniversityBall State UniversityNational University of SingaporeAlzheimer's AssociationFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaBill and Melinda Gates FoundationUniversity of WashingtonKarolinska Institutet
Mots-clésBurden of diseaseDisease burdenEpilepsyDiseaseMedicinePsychiatryInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Seizures and their consequences contribute to the burden of epilepsy because they can cause health loss (premature mortality and residual disability). Data on the burden of epilepsy are needed for health-care planning and resource allocation. The aim of this study was to quantify health loss due to epilepsy by age, sex, year, and location using data from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study. METHODS: We assessed the burden of epilepsy in 195 countries and territories from 1990 to 2016. Burden was measured as deaths, prevalence, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs; a summary measure of health loss defined by the sum of years of life lost [YLLs] for premature mortality and years lived with disability), by age, sex, year, location, and Socio-demographic Index (SDI; a compound measure of income per capita, education, and fertility). Vital registrations and verbal autopsies provided information about deaths, and data on the prevalence and severity of epilepsy largely came from population representative surveys. All estimates were calculated with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs). FINDINGS: In 2016, there were 45·9 million (95% UI 39·9-54·6) patients with all-active epilepsy (both idiopathic and secondary epilepsy globally; age-standardised prevalence 621·5 per 100 000 population; 540·1-737·0). Of these patients, 24·0 million (20·4-27·7) had active idiopathic epilepsy (prevalence 326·7 per 100 000 population; 278·4-378·1). Prevalence of active epilepsy increased with age, with peaks at 5-9 years (374·8 [280·1-490·0]) and at older than 80 years of age (545·1 [444·2-652·0]). Age-standardised prevalence of active idiopathic epilepsy was 329·3 per 100 000 population (280·3-381·2) in men and 318·9 per 100 000 population (271·1-369·4) in women, and was similar among SDI quintiles. Global age-standardised mortality rates of idiopathic epilepsy were 1·74 per 100 000 population (1·64-1·87; 1·40 per 100 000 population [1·23-1·54] for women and 2·09 per 100 000 population [1·96-2·25] for men). Age-standardised DALYs were 182·6 per 100 000 population (149·0-223·5; 163·6 per 100 000 population [130·6-204·3] for women and 201·2 per 100 000 population [166·9-241·4] for men). The higher DALY rates in men were due to higher YLL rates compared with women. Between 1990 and 2016, there was a non-significant 6·0% (-4·0 to 16·7) change in the age-standardised prevalence of idiopathic epilepsy, but a significant decrease in age-standardised mortality rates (24·5% [10·8 to 31·8]) and age-standardised DALY rates (19·4% [9·0 to 27·6]). A third of the difference in age-standardised DALY rates between low and high SDI quintile countries was due to the greater severity of epilepsy in low-income settings, and two-thirds were due to a higher YLL rate in low SDI countries. INTERPRETATION: Despite the decrease in the disease burden from 1990 to 2016, epilepsy is still an important cause of disability and mortality. Standardised collection of data on epilepsy in population representative surveys will strengthen the estimates, particularly in countries for which we currently have no or sparse data and if additional data is collected on severity, causes, and treatment. Sizeable gains in reducing the burden of epilepsy might be expected from improved access to existing treatments in low-income countries and from the development of new effective drugs worldwide. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Méta-analyse · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,072
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,144

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,015
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,009
Bibliométrie0,0060,012
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,041
Tête enseignante GPT0,340
Écart entre enseignants0,299 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeMéta-analyse
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1 003
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Lancet NeurologyMême sujetEpilepsy research and treatmentTravaux en français237 207