MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2911700450 · doi:10.1097/qad.0000000000002137

Evidence-informed practical recommendations for increasing physical activity among persons living with HIV

2019· article· en· W2911700450 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Jessica L. Montoya, Catherine M. Jankowski, Kelly K. O’Brien, Allison R. Webel, Krisann K. Oursler, Brook L. Henry, David J. Moore, Kristine M. Erlandson

Notice bibliographique

RevueAIDS · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHIV-related health complications and treatments
Établissements canadiensToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institute on Drug AbuseNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Institute on Aging
Mots-clésHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)MedicineGerontologyEnvironmental healthFamily medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction With the advent of effective antiretroviral therapy (ART), the care of persons living with HIV (PLWH) is shifting focus to the management of age-related chronic health conditions (e.g. metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease), syndromes of ageing (e.g. dementia and frailty) and side effects related to ART. Non-ART polypharmacy is common among PLWH and associated with an increasing risk of hospitalization and mortality [1]; thus, nonpharmacologic management of comorbidities is critical for PLWH who may experience an earlier onset and a greater burden of comorbidities. Routine engagement in health-enhancing behaviours, including physical activity, may help prevent and manage comorbid health conditions and syndromes of ageing common among PLWH [2]. Physical activity refers to any bodily movement produced by muscle contraction that causes energy expenditure, whereas exercise is a subset of physical activity that involves planned, repetitive body movement with the intent to increase well being and energy level to allow for independent participation in physical activities [3]. The goal of this narrative review is to summarize key literature from the past 10 years examining the benefits of physical activity and to outline recommendations to prescribe and support physical activity engagement among PLWH. The second edition of Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans issued by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) [4] proposes that adults – even those with chronic conditions and disability – engage in at least 150–300 min of moderate-intensity or 75–150 min of vigorous-intensity aerobic physical activity per week, as well as muscle strengthening activities on two or more days a week. Balance training is additionally recommended as part of older adults’ weekly physical activity to reduce fall risk. Importantly, HHS emphasizes that moving more and sitting less will benefit nearly everyone, with the most sedentary and least active individuals experiencing the greatest benefit from small physical activity increases [5]. Although some PLWH may have unique physical limitations that must be accommodated in order for them to safely engage in physical activity, the take-home recommendation is that physical activity participation is key to maximizing health and function. For additional information regarding physical activity recommendations and safety precautions for patients with combinations of cardiovascular disease risk factors (i.e. obesity, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus and dyslipidaemia), we refer the reader to an expert consensus statement on physical activity prescription [6]. Despite the well established health benefits of physical activity (summarized in Table 1) [7–41], rates among PLWH remain low. A meta-analysis of 24 studies involving nearly 4000 PLWH found that only half of the individuals engaged in 150 min of moderate-intensity physical activity [42]. Among middle-aged PLWH, 26% reported no moderate, vigorous, or muscle strengthening physical activity, similar to rates in the U.S. general population [43]. These physical activity trends are consistent across settings: 32% of Vietnamese adults with HIV reported low or no physical activity [44,45], with similar rates in the Swiss HIV Cohort study (41%) [46], Germany (39%) [47] and Brazil (44%) [7]. Despite limited engagement in physical activity, results of a qualitative study found that PLWH understood the health promotion benefits of physical activity and thought physical activity should be a greater priority in their life [48].Table 1: Summary of key findings from published studies (2009–2018) investigating the effects of physical activity on different body systems among adults living with HIV.Table 1: (Continued) Summary of key findings from published studies (2009–2018) investigating the effects of physical activity on different body systems among adults living with HIV.Alternative types of physical activity In addition to traditional aerobic (e.g. walking, biking and swimming) and resistance exercises (Table 1), lower intensity physical activity such as yoga is associated with positive benefits among PLWH, including an improvement in quality of life [8], reduction of depressive symptoms [9] and reduction of blood pressure [9,49]. Tai Chi was also associated with improved well being and balance in PLWH [50]. The benefits of high-intensity exercise are similarly evident: Erlandson et al.[10] recently demonstrated that among older PLWH, high-intensity aerobic and resistance exercise (based on target heart rate and resistance load) improved endurance and strength to a similar, if not greater, extent than moderate-intensity exercise. Oursler et al.[51] similarly demonstrated significant gains in endurance among older PLWH exercising at a higher than a more moderate-intensity aerobic programme. These studies of high-intensity exercise have indicated no reason to dissuade PLWH – young or old – from progressing to high-intensity exercise following several weeks of moderate-intensity training. More details about the effectiveness of various types of physical activity among PLWH can be found in a recent meta-analysis [52]. Barriers to physical activity among persons living with HIV Understanding barriers to physical activity specific to, or more pronounced among, PLWH is essential to developing effective, patient-centred physical activity recommendations. Across populations, physical activity is affected by diverse factors, including intrapersonal, interpersonal and environmental barriers. Intrapersonal barriers In a systematic review of 45 studies of physical activity in PLWH [53], lower engagement in physical activity was consistently associated with demographic (i.e. older age and fewer years of formal education), HIV-specific and biologic (i.e. being on ART, lower CD4+ T-cell counts, lipodystrophy, lower cardiorespiratory fitness and opportunistic infections) and psychological (i.e. lower motivation, depression and worse self-perceived physical function) variables. Moreover, the experience of these physical and mental health challenges that hinder engagement in physical activity may be unpredictable and episodic for PLWH [54]. Many PLWH experience great symptom burden, including neuropathy [55], fatigue [56] and reduced cardiorespiratory fitness [57], with even greater impairments among older PLWH [58]. Reduced cardiorespiratory fitness among PLWH as indicated by impaired peripheral oxygen uptake [49], dysfunction of skeletal muscle mitochondria [59], reduction in mitochondrial DNA content [60] and/or limitations in lung function [61] (e.g. impaired carbon monoxide diffusion capacity [62]) may interfere with adaptation to physical activity. Aerobic and resistance exercise, however, may reduce symptoms such as HIV-related fatigue [11,12]. Adherence to a moderate-intensity, home-based, aerobic exercise [12] or a supervised aerobic and resistance exercise intervention has shown reduced fatigue among PLWH, with increased benefit among those with high adherence [11]. Interpersonal barriers Social factors, including worries about HIV disclosure and stigma [63] and a lack of social support [64], can also hinder participation in physical activity. Interviews of PLWH who participated in a community-based exercise programme, however, indicated that participants found the environment less stigmatizing than initially feared, suggesting the malleability of social determinants of physical activity engagement. Healthcare providers’ recommendations can also play a key role in perceptions and engagement in physical activity among PLWH [65]. When providers only focus on HIV-related health outcomes and do not recommend routine physical activity, PLWH have less recognition of the health benefits of physical activity [65]. Environmental barriers Environmental barriers to physical activity may be more pronounced among PLWH, such as concern about physical safety [66]. Although fitness centres may be ideal venues for engaging in physical activity, access may be limited by physical and financial accessibility [67,68], and/or concerns regarding potential stigma related to body image [54]. Thus, when developing a physical activity plan, environmental barriers may need to be considered and solutions for overcoming these barriers may need to be identified (e.g. encouraging outdoor activity, access to indoor facilities such as a shopping mall or short bouts of physical activity throughout the day that do not require gym access or equipment). Collectively, this body of literature on barriers to physical activity among PLWH indicates an interplay of intrapersonal, interpersonal and environmental factors. Considering potential barriers to physical activity and plausible solutions are essential components of a physical activity action plan for PLWH. PLWH may benefit from an individualized approach to promoting physical activity, such as a gradual increase in activity, a different type of physical activity or physical activity environment, additional social support and/or a physical activity prescription that is tailored to the goals, abilities and interests of the individual in order to restore and achieve levels of cardiorespiratory fitness and physical function similar to HIV-uninfected peers. Behaviour change strategies for increasing engagement in physical activity The American Heart Association recommends the routine assessment and promotion of physical activity as a ‘vital sign’ with every patient at every visit [69]. Assessment and promotion of physical activity in the healthcare setting has been found to be so effective at improving patient outcomes that some healthcare systems have begun including physical activity as a vital sign in the electronic medical record [69]. The current extensive primary care guidelines for PLWH include detailed screening and management recommendations for hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and other common health conditions but do not mention physical activity assessment or counselling either routinely or in the management of comorbidities. The primary care guidelines for PLWH do recommend healthcare encounters every 3–6 months [70]: these frequent healthcare encounters provide excellent opportunities for healthcare providers to inquire about and promote physical activity among PLWH. A recent review confirms that assessment and promotion of physical activity by healthcare providers has a small to moderate positive effect on increasing physical activity levels, with larger effects observed when multiple behaviour change strategies are implemented [71]. One simple, effective behaviour change strategy is a physical activity prescription that is collaboratively developed by the patient and provider [72,73]. We adapted the physical activity prescription from the ‘Exercise is Medicine’ website [74] and included several behaviour change strategies that can be personalized (Fig. 1). The adapted physical activity prescription form allows healthcare providers to encourage patients to progress to higher levels of physical activity and/or work towards meeting the HHS recommendations by gradually increasing the amount of time, intensity or number of times a week they are physically active. For sedentary or physically inactive PLWH, prescribing movement breaks or walking may be a practical initial strategy to increase physical activity, as it does not require special skills or equipment [75].Fig. 1: Example physical activity prescription.Effective behaviour change strategies that consider readiness to engage in physical activity in the context of living with a sometimes unpredictable and episodic illness are needed to optimally promote adherence to a physical activity prescription among PLWH [68]. On the basis of HIV-specific literature in combination with existing behaviour change techniques recommended for all persons [76,77], we recommend adoption of behaviour change strategies, such as self-monitoring of physical activity; goal setting and action planning; prompts, cues or scheduling; and social support. Providing these strategies to patients may increase the likelihood of initiation and maintenance or sustained uptake of physical activity, ultimately leading to improved health and wellness in this population. We briefly summarize the benefits of the following approaches. Self-monitoring is a useful physical activity behaviour change technique [77] that can include the use of wearable motion-sensing technologies (e.g. pedometers, Fitbit) [78], smartphone applications and online tracking resources such as Go4Life from the National Institute on Aging [79]. Self-monitoring can also occur using low-technology strategies such as a pen and paper diary. Results from a scoping study indicated that wireless activity monitors are increasingly used among PLWH as an outcome measure of physical activity; however, evidence of their effectiveness to enhance physical activity among PLWH is scarce [80]. Goal setting and action planning are effective behavioural strategies for increasing engagement in physical activity [81]. Goal setting encourages specific behavioural resolution (e.g. engaging in more physical activity this week), while action planning involves detailed planning of what the person will do, when they will engage in the specified behaviour and for how long. Combining behaviour change techniques, a person can self-monitor physical activity (e.g. steps per day) and then set a behavioural goal (e.g. increasing the number of steps by 10% per week). Action planning builds upon goal setting by linking behaviours to situational cues or an existing behaviour (i.e. associative learning). For example, physical activity can be linked with the use of transportation (e.g. exiting one stop early on the subway or bus, parking at the outskirts of a parking lot and taking the stairs), to establish a habit. Prompts, cues and scheduling that remind PLWH to engage in physical activity may drive habit formation and improve long-term physical activity adherence. Prescheduled activity is more often adhered to than relying on impromptu self-motivation [82]. A calendar, alarms and/or cell phone reminders to set aside a specific time for physical activity can support physical activity scheduling. An ongoing study is evaluating the effectiveness of a novel Short Message Service intervention (iSTEP) to increase moderate physical activity among PLWH [83,84]. Social support is strongly linked to physical activity engagement. Recent data clearly describe the prominent role that healthcare providers have in integrating health promotion into routine HIV care [65]. Thus, providers can leverage their strong patient relationships to emphasize a holistic concept of well being that includes physical activity [65]. Persons are more likely to engage in physical activity if they are linked to a similarly motivated person with whom they are able to engage in physical activity, creating a ‘buddy system’ (e.g. making a ‘contract’ with others to achieve specified levels of physical activity or participating in group exercise) [85]. In addition, the social environment of group exercise can enhance motivation and adherence to physical activity among older PLWH [86]. Conclusion Similar to the general population, approximately one-third of PLWH do not achieve the minimum physical activity guidelines despite the numerous health benefits across the life span. HIV providers have a responsibility to assess and promote physical activity in the routine healthcare of all PLWH. These evidence-based practice recommendations can be used as a tool to facilitate engagement in physical activity among PLWH. Acknowledgements J.L.M, C.M.J, D.J.M and K.M.E. provided substantial contribution to the conception of this opinion piece and collaboratively wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors critically revised and provided final approval of the manuscript. We acknowledge Roberto Gallardo for his contribution to the design and revision of Fig. 1. K.K.O’B. is supported by a Canada Research Chair (CRC) in Episodic Disability and Rehabilitation. K.E. is supported by the National Institute of Aging of the National Institutes of Health K23AG050260 and AG054366. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,017
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,344

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,067
Tête enseignante GPT0,399
Écart entre enseignants0,332 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations70
Publié2019
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAIDSMême sujetHIV-related health complications and treatmentsTravaux en français237 207