MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2911795375

Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce

2012· article· en· W2911795375 sur OpenAlexaff
Boi Faltings, Kevin Leyton‐Brown, Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueDigital Platforms and Economics
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésComputer scienceNoveltyLibrary scienceOperations researchEngineering
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The papers in these proceedings were presented at the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC'12), held June 4-8 in Valencia, Spain. Since 1999 the ACM Special Interest Group on Electronic Commerce (SIGecom) has sponsored the leading scientific conference on advances in theory, systems, and applications for electronic commerce. The natural focus of the conference is on computer science issues, but the conference is interdisciplinary in nature, including research in economics and research related to (but not limited to) the following three non-exclusive focus areas: TF: Theory and Foundations (Computer Science Theory; Economic Theory) AI: Artificial Intelligence (AI, Agents, Machine Learning, Data Mining) EA: Experimental and Applications (Empirical Research, Experience with E-Commerce Applications) In addition to the main technical program, EC'12 featured four workshops and five tutorials. EC'12 was also co-located with the Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) 2012 Conference. The call for papers attracted 219 submissions from authors in academia and industry all around the world --- a new record for the conference, and indeed a 16% increase over the previous record. Each paper was reviewed by at least three program committee members (all of whom were active researchers with PhDs) and two senior program committee members (who were all prominent, senior researchers) on the basis of scientific novelty, technical quality, and importance to the field. This matching was performed algorithmically, and offered the guarantee that there existed no blocking pairs of a reviewer who preferred a different paper and a paper that preferred a different reviewer. After extensive discussion and deliberation among the program committee, senior program committee and program chairs, 73 papers were selected for presentation at the conference. 57 of these are published in these proceedings. For the remaining 16, at the authors' request, only abstracts are included along with pointers to full working papers. This option accommodates the practices of fields outside of computer science in which conference publishing can preclude journal publishing. We expect that many of the papers in these proceedings will appear in a more polished and complete form in scientific journals in the future. For the first time, authors were allowed to explicitly align their papers with one or two of the conference's three focus areas, with the guarantee that they would be reviewed by SPC members and PC members aligned with the same area(s). Overall, the conference accepted submissions in every one of the six tracks induced by the three focus areas, with the TF, AI and EA tags being chosen by 147, 62 and 47 submissions and 50, 22 and 13 accepted papers respectively. (Note: because some papers chose two tags, these numbers sum to more than 219 and 73 respectively.) These tracks existed solely to provide a fair review process across different communities. To emphasize commonalities among the problems studied at EC, and to facilitate interchange at the conference, sessions were organized by topic rather than by focus area, and no indication of a paper's focus area(s) was given at the conference or appears in these proceedings. Also for the first time at EC, a third of the papers were presented in plenary sessions, with the other two thirds in parallel sessions. (Thus, attendees spent half their time in plenary sessions.) Quality was a necessary but not sufficient condition for getting a plenary slot; it was also necessary for reviewers to judge that a paper had broad appeal. Some of the conference's technically strongest work addressed smaller cross-sections of the community, and so appeared in parallel sessions. We had one overlap day with AAMAS, our co-located sister conference. We had a variety of joint activities: two invited talks (Colin Camerer and Moshe Tennenholtz), common coffee breaks, and two shared poster sessions (featuring EC papers, AAMAS papers, and EC-relevant papers published in the broader community over the last year). The latter poster session was another innovation this year: we solicited posters for papers relevant to the EC community that had been published in other venues during the past year. We accepted 22 posters for this session, and also featured posters from all EC authors who wished to present their paper in this additional format.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,223
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,747

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,010
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0120,009
Science ouverte0,0020,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,2230,103

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,208
Écart entre enseignants0,176 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations28
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetDigital Platforms and EconomicsTravaux en français237 207