Anti-Glycoprotein V Autoantibodies in Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia: Regularly Detectable and Functionally Relevant
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) results from autoimmunization against platelet antigens. Autoantibodies (aabs) are considered to represent a major mechanism of thrombocytopenia in ITP by inducing platelet clearance from the circulation. Several lines of evidence demonstrate that aabs against glycoproteins (GP) IIb/IIIa and Ib/IX are predominant in ITP patients. Both disease severity and treatment response rates to specific therapeutics have been associated with aabs patterns. GP V is a well characterized immune target in Varicella-associated and drug-induced thrombocytopenia, but has never been studied systematically in ITP. In this study, patients with a suspected diagnosis of primary ITP were included once they met pre-defined clinical inclusion criteria. The presence of GP IIb/IIIa-, GP Ib/IX, and GP V-specific aabs was investigated by monoclonal antibody immobilization of platelet antigens (MAIPA) assay, both on patients' autologous platelets (direct MAIPA) and in serum (indirect MAIPA). In addition, serum IgG fractions were prepared from all patients with a positive direct MAIPA. IgG fractions were tested by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) technology for the presence of anti-GP V aabs. Complete data sets were obtained from 1,140 qualified patients. Platelet-bound aabs were detected in 343/1,140 patients (30.1%). Of these, 222 (64.7%) had platelet-bound anti-GP V aabs, either alone (10/222), or together with other specificities (211/222). Free anti-GP V aabs were detected in 30/222 patients by indirect MAIPA, but in 88/222 by SPR. The avidity of aabs detected by both methods (n=29; R700/R350=0.73±0.14) was significantly higher than the avidity for aabs detected by SPR only (n=59; R700/R350=0.32±0.13, p < 0.001). In order to study the potential biological relevance of anti-GP V, a phagocytosis assay using CD14+ positively-selected macrophages from spleen specimens from splenectomized ITP patients was performed. Anti-GPV aabs induced a modest amount of platelet uptake above the normal human serum-incubated control. No difference was observed between high avidity and low avidity anti-GP V. The effect of anti-GPV on platelet clearance was further studied in a NOD/SCID mouse model. Freshly isolated human platelets were injected into the lateral mouse tail vein; after 30 min, IgG fractions isolated from human sera containing anti-GPV antibodies or control sera from healthy donors were injected into the other lateral tail vein, and the survival of human platelets in the mouse circulation was analyzed by taking murine blood 60, 120, 300 min and 24h after baseline. High avidity and low avidity anti-GP V aabs (n=3 per group) eliminated human platelets with no detectable difference between the groups (mean platelet survival at t=300 min: 40% [range 27-55] versus 35% [range, 16-46]). A comparable, dose-dependent platelet clearance was also obtained with monoclonal antibody SW16 against GP V. In summary, we have demonstrated that anti-GP V autoantibodies are regularly detectable in ITP patients; and that they are able to induce phagocytosis and platelet clearance. Our findings have implications for both, further development of laboratory testing, and guidance for clinical decision making. First, comparison between MAIPA and SPR reveals that free aabs may be more frequent than reported, since aabs appear to escape detection by standard laboratory methods because of low avidity. Better test methods are required. Second, predicting disease severity and/or tailoring ITP therapy can possibly not be restricted to the postulated difference between anti-GP IIb/IIIa and anti-GP Ib/IX. Prospective studies are required to understand the impact of different GP-specific platelet aabs on the clinical course of ITP including, anti-GP V. Disclosures Rummel: Celgene: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Symbio: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eisai: Honoraria. Bakchoul:Aspen Germany gGmbH, CLS Behring, Stago gGmbH: Honoraria; German Research Society (DFG): Research Funding; Robert Bosch gGmbH: Research Funding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».