MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2912279633 · doi:10.1182/blood.v128.22.1683.1683

Differential Gene Expression Using RNA Sequencing Between Elderly Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Patients with Long Versus Short-Term Survival

2016· article· en· W2912279633 sur OpenAlexaff
Amy M. Trottier, Adnan Mansoor, Carolyn Owen, Ariz Akhter, Etienne Mahé, Michelle Geddes

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensCalgary Laboratory ServicesUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOncologyMyeloid leukemiaMedicineInternal medicinePopulationSurvival analysisTranscriptomeBioinformaticsBiologyGeneGeneticsGene expression

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Advances in genetic sequencing have shed light on the biological underpinnings of AML, however, the vast majority of previous work has focused on young patients, with little evidence-based data in the elderly population. Older age at diagnosis is a well-known poor prognostic factor, however prognostication within the older age group itself remains a challenge making therapeutic decision making particularly difficult. In this pilot project we studied the transcriptomes of short and long-lived elderly AML patients to gain insight into the potential molecular differences and signaling pathways that may help better prognosticate patients within this unique population. Methods Elderly patients (age > 65 and not fit for induction chemotherapy) with newly diagnosed AML (excluding APL) between 2011 - 2015, inclusive, with an available diagnostic bone marrow biopsy sample were considered for inclusion in this retrospective analysis. Patients were divided into two groups: long-term survivors (survival ≥ 6 months) and short-term survivors (survival < 2 months). RNA sequencing was performed on 12 patients in the long-term survivors group and 24 patients in the short-term survivors group. RNA sequencing was conducted using the Illumina platform (Illumina NextSeq 500) and data analysis was performed with TopHat and Cufflinks software. Results Baseline clinical characteristics were similar between the short-term and long-term survival groups as shown in Table 1. RNA sequencing revealed 41 genes with statistically significant (p-values < 0.001 and false-discovery q-values < 0.001) differential expression between the long-term and short-term survival groups. See Figure 1 for a heat map reflecting the gene expression values between groups. Of these 41 genes several are known to be involved in key cellular functions and signaling pathways including RNA post-transcription regulation, apoptosis, p53 regulation, and the mTOR pathway. However, only a few have previously been studied in AML (e.g. ERG, PCK2, and ABCG1) and none have been examined in the context of elderly AML patients. Twelve of the 41 differentially expressed genes were small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs), a class of regulatory RNAs involved in post-transcriptional modification of ribosomal RNA. These were found to be down regulated in the short-term survivors compared to the long-term survivors (p-value range 0.00005 - 0.001). This is a novel finding. Although recent studies have found differences in snoRNA expression in AML and ALL compared to healthy donors there are no published studies examining the role of snoRNA in the prognosis of AML. CYFIP2 is involved in caspase activation and cellular apoptosis and was found to be relatively under expressed in the short-term survivors group (p-value 0.008). WRAP53 plays an important role in the regulation of p53 expression and was found to be under-expressed in the long-term survivors. PRR5L is associated with mTORC2 and was found to be relatively over-expressed in the long-term survivors (p-value 0.00002). Due to the small sample sizes of this pilot project multivariate analysis was not conducted. In addition to the individual genes, these results highlight differences in several pathways, namely the mTOR, and p53 tumor suppressor/caspase apoptotic pathways, which may be associated with prognosis for elderly patients with newly diagnosed AML and deserve further investigation. The finding of down regulation of numerous snoRNAs in elderly patients with poor outcome also warrants further detailed study with larger sample sizes to fully elucidate their potential prognostic value. Figure 1: Heat Map highlighting the differential gene expressions from RNA sequencing for long-term compared to short-term survivors. Conclusion We have identified distinctly different gene expression profiles in elderly AML patients with long-term compared to short-term survival. These differentially expressed genes provide biologic insight into AML in the elderly as well as highlight candidate pathways and cellular mechanisms on which to base future detailed study to enable accurate prognostication and improved therapeutic decision making in this understudied population. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Owen: Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Lundbeck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Geddes:Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,005

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,290
Écart entre enseignants0,253 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→Travaux en français237 207→