PECULIARITIES OF ANDRAGOGS TRAINING FOR SYSTEM OF ADULT EDUCATION IN THE USA AND CANADA
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Peculiarities of andragogs training in the USA and Canada are singled out. Competence approach is analyzed. Competence approach is aimed at formation of readiness to use effectively knowledge, skills, values, psychological peculiarities of people and information, human and material resources for achieving aim. Concept “competence” is viewed. Department of education in the USA views competence as complex of skills, which are necessary for fulfillment of a certain assignment. In other sources competence is viewed as ability to fulfill individual or social requirements and successful fulfillment of tasks. Departments of educational establishments that train andragogs are classified. Professional training of andragogs is conducted at administrative departments, which are called colleges or schools. There is only slight difference between college and school. Some universities have at their structure colleges and schools. Levels of higher education in the USA and Canada are systematized. Training of specialists is conducted at three levels: bachelor, master, doctor of philosophy. Programs of andragogs training are classified. Taking into account content peculiarities all programs of andragogs training are subdivided into three groups: specializing in adult education, specializing in leadership in adult education, interdisciplinary programs. Peculiarities of program “Adult education” master and doctor of philosophy levels are singled out. Comparative analysis of master and doctor of philosophy programs is conducted. Bachelor, master and doctor of philosophy programs have not only differences, but also some common features. Common features are the following integration of theory and practice and taking into account results of scientific research. It is shown that various master's programs are distinguished by the number of disciplines, content, and requirements for the master's degree program are higher. It has been found that PhD programs aim at deepening knowledge and acquiring andragogical competencies, developing research skills, and the doctoral programs in adult education focus on training leaders and practitioners. Research results demonstrate that that US and Canadian colleges and universities carry out not only the professional training of future professionals in the field of adult education, but also provide their further professional development through the creation of professional associations of adult education professionals, resource education centers, trainings, etc
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».