Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS) conference series brings together researchers from around the world to share the latest advances in the field. It is the premier forum for research in the theory and practice of autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. AAMAS 2002, the first of the series, was held in Bologna, followed by Melbourne (2003), New York (2004), Utrecht (2005), Hakodate (2006), Honolulu (2007), Estoril (2008), Budapest (2009), Toronto (2010), Taipei (2011), Valencia (2012), Saint Paul (2013), and Paris (2014). This volume constitutes the proceedings of AAMAS 2015, the fourteenth conference in the series, held in Istanbul in May 2015. In line with previous editions, AAMAS 2015 attracted submissions for a general track and four special tracks: Innovative Applications, Robotics, Virtual Agents and Humans, and the Blue Sky Ideas track. The special tracks were chaired by leaders in their corresponding fields: Amal El Fallah Seghrouchni and Milind Tambe chaired the Innovative Applications track, Alessandro Farinelli and Gal Kaminka the Robotics track, Catholijn Jonker and Rui Prada the Virtual Agents and Humans track, and Victor Lesser the Blue Sky Ideas track. The special track chairs were responsible for appointing the Programme Committee (PC) members and the Senior Programme Committee members (SPC) for their tracks, and they made acceptance/rejection decisions for their tracks in consultation with Programme Chairs based on input provided by the track PC and SPC. Members of the PC and SPC of the special tracks also reviewed papers on topics of their expertise submitted to the general track. Full paper submissions (8 pages plus bibliographic references) and Blue Sky Ideas paper submissions (4 pages plus references) were solicited for AAMAS 2015. Some of the full paper submissions were accepted as extended abstracts (2 pages). The papers were selected by means of a thorough review and discussion process, which included an opportunity for authors to respond to reviewer comments. All SPC members followed and contributed to the technical discussions on the papers they were overseeing. Full papers were presented orally in 15-minute slots; all extended abstracts and, optionally, full papers were presented as posters during the conference. Out of the 670 submissions, 395 (59%) had a student as the primary author, 108 of these (27%) were accepted as full papers, and a further 91 (23%) were accepted as extended abstracts. The proceedings also contain 30 Demonstration papers, 29 Doctoral Consortium papers, as well as abstracts of the invited talks and details of some of the awards given. The overall conference programme also had 26 workshops and 8 tutorials, although that material is not included in the proceedings.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».