MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2912837387 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-117178

Duffy Antigen Phenotyping Is a Useful and Clinically Available Test for Benign Ethnic Neutropenia

2018· article· en· W2912837387 sur OpenAlexaff
Eric Y. Chang, Christopher A. Tormey, Alexa J. Siddon, Mahboubeh Rahmani, Ellice Wong

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueBlood disorders and treatments
Établissements canadiensDalhousie University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNeutropeniaMedicineImmunologySerologyAbsolute neutrophil countInternal medicineAntigenAntibodyChemotherapy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Benign Ethnic Neutropenia (BEN) is the most common form of neutropenia worldwide and is usually defined as a neutrophil count under 1.5x103/uL without increased infection risk. BEN has been observed predominantly in individuals of African ancestry as well as in certain Middle Eastern ethnic groups. The discovery of neutropenia during routine laboratory testing, however, may prompt extensive workup for infectious, autoimmune, and hematologic disorders. Identifying a readily available test to diagnose BEN in the appropriate ethnic and clinical setting could preempt unnecessary and invasive testing such as a bone marrow aspiration and biopsy and minimize patient anxiety. The absence of the red blood cell (RBC) Duffy antigen, Fy (a- b-), is thought to be responsible for BEN. As the Duffy antigen is utilized by the parasite Plasmodium vivax to enter the RBC, it has been hypothesized that in West Africa, positive selection for the null allele enabled individuals to be protected against infection and have a survival advantage. Aim: Our study examined whether testing for the Fy phenotype could reliably be used as a clinical assay to identify patients with BEN. Methods: Our cases included patients at the VA CT Healthcare System clinically diagnosed with BEN and controls that were chosen randomly from the pools of patients for whom a CBC and type and screen were checked for any other reason. Both probable BEN cases and controls were tested for the Fy phenotype using standard serologic methods in the blood bank. The Fy phenotype, absolute neutrophil count (ANC), white blood cell count (WBC), hemoglobin level, platelet count, and medical diagnoses were extracted from the medical record. Applicable data were compared statistically using the Mann-Whitney U Test with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Our study included 32 patients (mean age 54, range 21 to 90) who were clinically identified as probable BEN cases and 50 patients (mean age 68, range 38 to 97) chosen as controls. In the probable BEN group, 28 patients self-identified as African American or Black and 3 declined self-identification. In the control group, 11 patients self-identified as African American or Black, 34 self-identified as White, 2 self-identified as Hispanic, 2 declined self-identification, and 1 self-identified as Native Hawaiian. The majority of probable BEN patients (31 of 32) and only a minority of control patients (6 of 50) were Fy (a- b-). Most study patients were male: 30 of 32 probable BEN patients and all control patients were male. The mean ANC count for Fy(a- b-) probable BEN patients was significantly lower than controls (1.68x103/uL versus 5.46x103/uL, p < 0.0001). Similarly, the mean WBC count for Fy (a- b-) probable BEN patients was significantly lower than the mean WBC for controls (3.72 x 103/uL versus 8.14 x 103/uL, p < 0.0001). Hemoglobin was comparable between Fy(a- b-) probable BEN patients and controls (12.91 g/dL versus 11.68 g/dL, p = 0.0673) as were platelets between Fy(a- b-) probable BEN patients and controls (194x103/uL versus 213x103/uL, p = 0.4354). The only African American patient presumed to have BEN that was not confirmed by Fy testing was found to have concurrent diagnoses that could otherwise explain his neutropenia (HIV/HCV). The remaining confirmed BEN cases did not have an accompanying marrow suppressive hematologic disorder. Five control group patients had potentially marrow suppressive hematologic disorders including myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia. Conclusions: Readily available serologic testing in the blood bank for Duffy antigen phenotyping can be used to confirm suspected BEN in patients with high clinical suspicion. Further testing is in progress of Fy phenotyping comparing controls with neutropenia for any reason to our proposed BEN population to better determine the positive predictive value. Fy phenotyping to confirm BEN suspicion may help avoid unnecessary and invasive neutropenia testing. In addition, since BEN affects certain ethnic groups (primarily those of African ancestry), these individuals may be unfairly excluded from possible treatment including cytopenia-inducing psychiatric medications like clozapine, myelosuppressive chemotherapy, and clinical trials due to ANC eligibility requirements. Fy phenotyping to confirm clinical suspicion of BEN could be a useful tool to help develop modified guidelines for neutropenia-inducing medication. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,007

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,289
Écart entre enseignants0,263 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetBlood disorders and treatmentsTravaux en français237 207