MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2912881431 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-117528

The Potential of Plant-Based Compounds As Iron Chelators

2018· article· en· W2912881431 sur OpenAlexaff
Sarah Lane, Farzam Viand, Kayla Bolduc, Juergen Ehlting, Patrick B. Walter

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiquePlant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Victoria
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLavandulaChelationChemistryChlorogenic acidBotanyLavenderHorticultureBiologyFood scienceOrganic chemistry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: The use of iron-chelators is an important clinical treatment for iron overload diseases such as β-Thalassemia (Thal) and neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation. Iron overload can impair immune cell, cardiac and neurological function. Iron chelation can alleviate some of this morbidity, but at increasing doses certain chelating agents can have serious side effects. Plant-based treatments may offer an alternative. In plants, Fe is required for photosynthesis and enzyme production but is often limited for uptake from the soil. When Fe is limited, plant roots may produce a range of compounds, including chelators, to assist in solubilizing Fe precipitates. Plant-produced phenolic acids such as p-coumaric acid (Cou), caffeic acid (Caf), or chlorogenic acid (CGA) have shown an affinity for Fe and may play a role in plant iron uptake. Plants adapted to environments where Fe is more difficult to access, such as alkaline soils, could show a higher prevalence of these compounds, along with plants generally abundant in phenolics. In this project, the alkaline tolerant plants Thuja plicata (cedar) and Lavandula x intermedia (lavender), along with the phenolic rich Populus trichocarpa x deltoides(Poplar), were investigated for their potential to produce Fe-chelators in response to low Fe. Methods: Cedar, lavender, and poplar cuttings were clonally propagated and cultivated aeroponically to improve efficiency of root collection. Extracts or exudates from roots grown with or without Fe were isolated for characterization as Fe-chelators. Phenolics from root washings were captured with chromatography and separated by collection into fractions in different solvents. These were evaluated for total phenolic concentration against gallic acid as a standard. An in vitro competition assay was used to characterize Fe-binding ability of root isolates. Isolates were compared to standard chelators DFO and EDTA, and model compounds Cou, Caf, and CGA to determine inhibition of the competition reaction. A bioassay quantified intracellular Fe in monocytic THP-1 cells (to model RE system) grown for 8 weeks with chronic relevant non-transferrin bound iron levels (4-20 μM Fe-citrate, CrFe) and without (Con). Cultures were also investigated for other effects of acute Fe treatment and potential chelators over time. Results: Aeroponic plant cultivation improved root health and growth compared to previous hydroponic methods. Fe-deficient plants produced isolates that were different from Fe-normal plants following an analysis of phenolic fractions. Isolates in isopropanol were found to be 104% more plentiful in Fe-deficient poplars, which may indicate Fe-chelating potential. Between species, lavender had the highest phenolic concentration in root isolates, followed by cedar and poplar. Cedar roots showed an increased composition of phenolics compared to Fe-deficient poplar, supporting the potential for species-specific Fe responses. Analysis of Fe responses between species is ongoing. Competition assays showed that lavender root isolates exhibited 36% greater inhibition than 80 μM EDTA and 46% greater than 100 μM DFO. In direct comparison to DFO at 50 μM, Caf was equivalent, CGA had 30% greater inhibition, and inhibition by Cou was 41% lower. CrFe cells had 104% greater intracellular Fe compared to Con cells. Addition of acute Fe over 24 h significantly increased Fe content of cells grown in both CrFe and Con conditions and altered cell viability. A dose-dependent reduction in Fe levels was seen with increasing CGA in both CrFe and Con cells. Overall, Fe in samples treated with CGA were comparable to those with DFO. The effect of plant root isolates on intracellular Fe and cell viability is ongoing. Conclusion: Plant species from different soil types have altered responses to Fe-deficiency. Lavender and cedar, more tolerant of unfavorable soils, may produce more Fe-chelating phenolics as part of their response to low Fe. This was observed in vitro, as lavender isolates contain chelators that stimulate inhibition of the competition reaction similarly to DFO and EDTA at moderate concentrations. As a model, Caf, CGA and Cou also prove to have Fe-chelating activity comparable to DFO at lower concentrations. After using these plant compounds in bioassays, their successful reduction of intracellular Fe in CrFe THP-1 cells show the promise of plant root isolates to be clinically useful Fe-chelators. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,222
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,174

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,193
Écart entre enseignants0,187 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetPlant Micronutrient Interactions and EffectsTravaux en français237 207