MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2913293482

Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Modeling in Software Engineering

2014· article· en· W2913293482 sur OpenAlex
Joanne M. Atlee, Vinay Kulkarni, Tony Clark, Bernhard Rumpe⋆

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Waterloo
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSoftware engineeringComputer scienceSocial software engineeringSoftware developmentModel-driven architectureMainstreamDomain (mathematical analysis)Software Engineering Process GroupSoftwareModeling languageEngineering managementSoftware development processSoftware constructionData scienceEngineering
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Models have long been used in the development of complex systems. Their use is becoming more prevalent in the software development domain as modeling techniques and tools mature. Despite this, there are many challenging issues that the modeling research community must address if software modeling practices are to become mainstream. Furthermore, software and systems have become more intertwined, and the modeling techniques used for systems engineering need to be harmonized with software models. The 2015 edition of the MiSE (Modeling in Software Engineering) workshop aimed at discussing the state-of-the-art and future challenges in modeling, while bringing together different communities of researchers and practitioners who develop, analyze and deploy models in solving engineering problems. The primary goal of MiSE 2015 was to foster the exchange of innovative ideas on the use of models in software engineering. Another goal of this workshop was to further promote cross-fertilization between the model-driven engineering (MDE) communities (e.g., who associate with the MoDELS conference) and software engineering communities. Previous versions of the workshop showed that while there is great interest in collaborations and discussions across these communities, there are differences in terminologies and concepts that need to be harmonized for effective communication to take place. To ensure that discussions at the 2015 workshop progressed beyond the basic alignment of concepts, potential workshop participants were encouraged to familiarize themselves with the papers presented at the previous MiSE workshops, as well as papers that were to be presented at MiSE 2015. The workshop provided a forum for discussing and critically analyzing modeling techniques with respect to their purposes in software engineering processes. Participants engaged in the exchange of innovative technical ideas and experiences related to modeling, including modeling notations, abstraction techniques, modeling strategies, and use of models in development activities, including system configuration, system simulation, testing, and product line variability management. The workshop aimed to explore the following major purposes of software modeling: •Exploration: where models are used to explore and learn about the problem to be solved --- where the problem can be, for example, requirements identification, system specification, system or component design, complex protocol or algorithm design. Of particular interest was the use of models to enable what-if? analysis and prognostics (e.g., prediction), such as via models of Big Data. •Communication: Communication models are used to document software decisions (e.g., requirements, designs, and deployment decisions), or to enable discussion, conversation and negotiation between different stake-holder groups with different perspectives, vocabularies and needs. •Support for downstream activities: software models can be used to answer questions or check properties (e.g., correctness, fitness for use) of the modeled artifact, to generate other artifacts, or to configure existing systems. •Configurability and adaptation: where we use models at runtime to configure the system and adapt it to changed needs of the users. A model of the environment also allows a system to capture its knowledge about the context it controls or communicates with. The 2015 workshop focused on analyzing both successful and unsuccessful applications of software modeling techniques to gain insights into challenging modeling problems, including: (1) identifying, describing, and using appropriate abstractions, (2) supporting incremental, iterative development through the use of appropriate model composition, transformation and other model manipulation operators, (3) automated analysis of possibly large, possibly incomplete models to determine the presence or absence of desired and undesired properties, and (4) using models to ask questions, enable decision-making in organizations, or to support prognostics related to important domain-specific questions.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Méthodes · Signal consensuel: Méthodes
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,436
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,305

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,258
Écart entre enseignants0,222 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle