MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2913452473

Učinak toksina botulinuma tipa – A na nemotoričke simptome u bolesnika s fokalnom distonijom

2018· dissertation· en· W2913452473 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueRepository of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Zagreb (Bryn Mawr College) · 2018
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCervical dystoniaNeurocognitiveApathyBeck Anxiety InventoryPsychologyBeck Depression InventoryAnxietyRating scaleCognitionMedicinePhysical therapyPsychiatryDystoniaDevelopmental psychology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Traditionally, isolated adult-onset cervical dystonia (IAOCD) is considered as a ‘pure’ motor disorder. However, non-motor symptoms (NMS) are increasingly recognized as a part of IOACD phenotype. Cognitive functions in IAOCD were rarely investigated and poorly understood making this issue still a matter of debate. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate, for the first time, the effect of acute and long-term therapeutic applications (more than one year) of botulinum toxin type-A (BoNT-A) on NMS and cognitive functions in IAOCD patients previously not treated with BoNT-A. Design/Methods: The study included 51 IAOCD patients (29 females and 22 males) and 90 (50 female i 40 males) age, gender and education matched healthy controls. Questionnaires used in this study included: Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS). Beck Depression Inventory – Second Edition (BDI-II), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Starkstein Apathy Scale (AS), Pitsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36). Cognitive functions were assessed using Cogtest®, a computerized neurocognitive battery set of 5 tests: Auditory Number Sequencing (ANS), Spatial Working Memory (SWM), Strategic Target Detection (STD), Continuous Performance Test – Flanker version (Flanker CPT) and Tower of London (ToL). All of the above mentioned investigations were performed prior to initial BoNT-A application (first test). The follow-up was performed after 4 month (second test) and 12 to 16 months after initial BoNT-A application (third test). During the follow-up period the patients received 3 BoNT-A applications. \nResults: On initial investigation 46 (90,2%) IAOCD patients had at least one psychiatric disorder in comparison to 36 (40%) healthy controls. Mean BDI-II score, BAI score and AS score were significantly higher in IAOCD patients than in healthy controls (12,59 ± 6,28 vs. 6,11 ± 4,26, p<0,001; 13,59 ± 6,78 vs. 7,76 ± 4.95, p<0,001; 10,27 ± 5,09 vs.7,68 ± 4,35, p=0,002, respectively). Mean PSQI and FSS score were higher in IAOCD patients (4,90 ± 1,7 vs. 4,08 ± 1.44, p=0,003; 4,17 ± 1,2 vs. 3,50 ± 0,95; p<0,001, respectively). There were no differences between IAOCD patients and controls in determined variables of ANS and SWM tests (p>0,05). However, IAOCD patients had worse performance in STD, ToL, and Flanker CPT test (p<0,05). IAOCD patients had significantly reduced quality of life (QoL) determined by SF-36 questionnaire. During follow-up period, we found no significant difference in total BDI-II, BAI, AS, PSQI and FSS score between all three tests. Still, no difference in total AS score on third test was observed between IAOCD and control group, and improvement in total PSQI score was observed in second and third test when compared to initial one. Significant pain amelioration, unrelated to improvement of motor symptoms, was observed during follow-up period. Long-term BoNT-A applications had no effect on cognitive performance as measured by ANS, SWM, Flanker CPT and ToL test. Significant improvement was detected in variables of strategic efficiency and total perseverative errors of STD test, designed for evaluation of complex attention and processing speed. Improvement of QoL was observed in two SF-36 domains: bodily pain and general health perception. \nConclusion: Spectrum of IAOCD symptoms includes various NMS such as pain, psychiatric comorbidities, impaired sleep quality, pathological fatigue, and cognitive dysfunction, especially in the domains of attention and executive functioning, thus implicating shared neurobiology of motor symptoms, NMS and cognitive dysfunction. Except for major analgesic effect and mild positive effect on sleep quality and apathy, long-term BoNT-A treatment had no statistically significant impact on other NMS. In addition, long-term BoNT-A application showed modest improvement of attention without any negative implication on other cognitive domains. Finally, we can say that in the dosages applied in this study (150-200U per application), BoNT-A is significantly effective in reducing pain and motor symptoms, probably minimally effective in improvement of sleep quality and apathy, ineffective in reducing anxiety, depression and fatigue. We did not find any negative influence of BoNT-A on cognitive functions with the applied objectivization methods, moreover, a slight improvement in complex attention and processing speed was found.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,014

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,242
Écart entre enseignants0,231 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueRepository of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Zagreb (Bryn Mawr College)Même sujetBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological DisordersTravaux en français237 207