MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2913583881 · doi:10.1353/tj.2018.0109

An Octoroon by Branden Jacobs-Jenkins

2018· article· en· W2913583881 sur OpenAlex
Jennifer Buckley

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueTheatre Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLiterature Analysis and Criticism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPerforming artsArtArt historyMovie theaterGeorge (robot)Style (visual arts)HistoryVisual artsSociology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: An Octoroon by Branden Jacobs-Jenkins Jennifer Buckley AN OCTOROON. By Branden Jacobs-Jenkins. Directed by Peter Hinton. Royal George Theatre at the Shaw Festival, Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario. July 16–October 14, 2017. The house lights were still up when André Sills walked alone to downstage center, faced an audience of about 300, and greeted them with a wave. “Hi, everyone,” he said. Despite the fact that Sills was clad only in Speedo-style black underwear, most spectators responded with a friendly sounding “Hi.” At this moment, those who knew little about Branden Jacobs-Jenkins’s An Octoroon but had seen Bernard Shaw’s Androcles and the Lion at the nearby Court House Theatre might have thought that Sills was engaging them in an equally lighthearted evening of what the cast of that show called “two-way theatre”—an occasion for performer/audience interaction, post-show conversation, and reflection. He was not. While some moments in An Octoroon were funnier than anything in Androcles, Jacobs-Jenkins’s play demanded a more intense engagement—intellectual and visceral at once—than many were prepared to sustain. Indeed, on the night I attended, early in its run, a substantial number of spectators walked out at intermission. That is a good thing, I believe, because what followed Sills’s greeting was more aesthetically and politically challenging than most of what the Shaw Festival staged that season, including artistic director Tim Carroll’s fine production of Saint Joan. Because I had seen Sarah Benson’s acclaimed Soho Rep production of An Octoroon during its 2015 run at Theatre for a New Audience and taught Jacobs-Jenkins’s script to majority-white classes, I expected the play to provoke discomfort in festival audiences. In fact, I hoped Peter Hinton’s production would do at least that much. Two-way theatre can and should entertain its audiences, but a Shaw Festival worthy of its name must not pull its punches. The young Bertolt Brecht gave “three cheers for Shaw,” not because Shaw was the kind of socialist that Brecht admired (he was not), but because he thought of the older playwright as an intellectual “terrorist”: one who placed politically unstable compounds within familiar dramatic structures, then detonated them with a smile on his face. The volatile elements of An Octoroon became apparent quickly enough. BJJ, one of three characters played by Sills and an obvious avatar for Jacobs-Jenkins, followed up his pleasant greeting with the lines, “I’m a ‘black playwright.’ I don’t know exactly what that means, but I’m here to tell you a story.” BJJ’s monologue—which relates a disastrous attempt to ameliorate what his therapist calls “low-grade depression” by staging Dion Boucicault’s American plantation melodrama The Octoroon (1859)—then morphs into a shouting match with “The Playwright,” a resurrected, drunken, [End Page 555] and profanity-prone version of Boucicault himself (Patrick McManus). That the Playwright’s inebriation seems to be a result of BJJ’s highly theatrical onstage drinking—Sills struck a deep lunge, flourished his arms, and chugged an entire bottle—is one of several early indications that the former is also an avatar of the latter. The ensuing verbal bout between the Playwright and BJJ, consisting as it does of screamed variations on the phrase “fuck you,” no doubt surprised longtime festival patrons. Anyone attending a show with Shaw’s name attached to it, in any capacity whatsoever, should be looking for something more bracing than what Brecht called “culinary theatre.” A bracing experience is what Hinton’s Canadian premiere of An Octoroon gave them—ready or not. During the prologue alone, spectators watched Sills apply whiteface makeup and a blond wig, preparing BJJ to perform the “white guy” parts he says white actors would not do because they’re wary of playing overt racists. Aided by an Assistant, the Playwright applied redface, readying himself to play the stereotypically rum-loving noble savage Wahnotee, as Boucicault did in his own production. Meanwhile, the Assistant, whom the script states is preferably played by a Native American, applies blackface for his roles as the enslaved Pete and Paul. Throughout this process, first BJJ and...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,526
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,296
Écart entre enseignants0,290 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle