MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2913673942 · doi:10.1353/gsr.2019.0017

Not Straight from Germany: Sexual Publics and Sexual Politics since Magnus Hirschfeld ed. by Michael Thomas Taylor, Annette F. Timm, and Rainer Herrn

2019· article· en· W2913673942 sur OpenAlex
Robert Tobin

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueGerman Studies Review · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEuropean history and politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésExhibitionPoliticsArt historyQueerScholarshipSociologyClassicsHistoryLawGender studiesPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Not Straight from Germany: Sexual Publics and Sexual Politics since Magnus Hirschfeld ed. by Michael Thomas Taylor, Annette F. Timm, and Rainer Herrn Robert Tobin Not Straight from Germany: Sexual Publics and Sexual Politics since Magnus Hirschfeld. Edited by Michael Thomas Taylor, Annette F. Timm, and Rainer Herrn. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2017. Pp. vii + 408. Cloth $85.00. ISBN 978-0472130351. As Annette F. Timm explains in her introduction, Not Straight from Germany is "a hybrid: part exhibition catalog, part a collection of interdisciplinary scholarship, and part a visual documentary of a historical past and its resonances in the present" (4). In addition to scholarly papers on Magnus Hirschfeld and his legacy, the volume describes art from PopSex!, a 2011 exhibition in Calgary, Alberta about sexology and its aftermath. Not Straight from Germany organizes many of its papers on sexual publics and sexual politics in terms of moral panics, the gaze, and print media. Reorganizing the contributions under different rubrics will give a sense of the variety of topics addressed in the volume. A constant theme of Not Straight from Germany is the visual aspect of sexological work. Michael Thomas Taylor's essay focuses on Hirschfeld's center and research as an exhibition, with a focus on the paradoxes inherent in Hirschfeld's public images of private matters. Katherine Peters's contribution concentrates on the status of Wilhelm von Gloeden's photographs in the scientific world. Although they were carefully staged on neoclassical models, early twentieth-century scientists enthusiastically appropriated them for images related to sexuality (182). In general, the illustrations and images in this collection are lavish. The editors have put together a useful visual sourcebook of forty-five images related to Hirschfeld and his institute, including copies of the "transvestite pass" that allowed people to cross-dress in Berlin and other cities in the early twentieth century, as well as a membership card in the Hilfsbund der Berliner Prostituierten (Aid-league of Berlin prostitutes). Similarly, Elizabeth Heinemann's contribution, "Consuming Sex," is "a photo-essay on the legacy of Magnus Hirschfeld in the West German industry, 1945–1975" (332). Both of these photo-essays point to the continuities between Hirschfeld's era and the postwar period, continuities that the collection also finds in censorship and the regulation of sex. Gary Stark provides a detailed analysis of the laws regulating performances on the stage and in film, as well as rules on censorship of print material, starting in the late nineteenth century and culminating in the 1926 Gesetz zur Bewahrung der Jugend von Schund- und Schmutzschriften (Law on the protection of children from trashy and smutty literature), which was then used as justification for the 1933 book burnings committed by the Nazis (127). Heinemann adds an account of how West Germany updated the Weimar-era law, while also reaffirming a more permissive 1927 law on sexually transmitted diseases, which provided a narrow window of opportunity for postwar purveyors of erotica (335). [End Page 158] Another strand within the collection examines the interface between science and the public. In a well-documented essay, Kevin Amidon argues that German scientists—often more interested in persuasion than data (193)—transition from the "diagnostic moment" of the early sexologists to the "narrative moment" of later thinkers, who became increasingly interested in heredity and eugenics (202). Rainer Herrn and Christine N. Brinckman analyze the films that promoted Eugen Steinach's popular early studies on the endocrine system. They focus not only on the cinematic representation of the research, but also on the specific images of the lab rats, which were cruelly "crucified" as their testicles were removed (225–226). Pamela E. Swett documents the continuing use of Hirschfeld's science, even after the Nazis came to power. They continued to sell his "Titus pills" for male sexual enhancement, but, according to Swett, the advertising shifted away from a focus on the unmet needs of the neglected wife to a direct celebration of male virility in the 1930s (314–317). Another strand of essays studies the relations between the genders in modern German life. Tobias Becker adds the foyers and corridors of variety theaters to the parks, bars, dance halls...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,153
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,324
Écart entre enseignants0,286 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle