MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2914147296 · doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.02.003

In Reply

2011· article· en· W2914147296 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Walter Herzog

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineVertebral arteryAnatomySpinal manipulationManual therapyCervical spineChiropracticSurgeryPathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I would like to thank the authors of the letter to the editor for their interest and constructive criticism of our work. The stretching of vertebral arteries (VA) during spinal manipulations (SMTs) of the neck has become an important clinical problem since the coroner's inquest into the death of Lana Lewis. The first scientific research aimed at directly measuring VA strains during neck SMTs was performed 8 years ago1Symons B Leonar T Herzog W Internal forces sustained by the vertebral artery during spinal manipulative therapy.J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002; 25: 504-510Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (79) Google Scholar and demonstrated that VA strains distal to C1 and proximal to C6 were much smaller than strains encountered during everyday movements of the neck/head. For technical reasons, we could not measure the strains of VA in segments C1 to C6, which was rectified in our recent work.2Wuest S Symons B Leonard T Herzog W Preliminary report: biomechanics of vertebral artery segments C1-C6 during cervical spine manipulation.J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010; 33: 273-278Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar The findings of this study were essentially the same as those found in the study of Symons et al,1Symons B Leonar T Herzog W Internal forces sustained by the vertebral artery during spinal manipulative therapy.J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002; 25: 504-510Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (79) Google Scholar supporting the idea that VA strains during SMTs were smaller than strains encountered during normal head and neck movements. The basic criticism in the letter to the editor was that the placement of our piezoelectric crystals does not allow measurement of VA strains between adjacent foramina, and the authors go on suggesting that our strain measurements were inaccurate because they were made across foramina and that tensile forces would not be fully transmitted across foramina. Although we agree that tensile forces are likely not fully transmitted across foramina, we must point out that strains are measurements of length changes and that the accuracy of these measurements is independent of force transmission across foramina. Furthermore, strains experienced by segments between adjacent foramina (the measurements suggested by the authors) are contained in the strains of the adjacent distal and proximal segments made in our study. In other words, the total strain along the entire VA is independent of the placement of the strain transducers, and thus, the average total strains for our setup and that suggested by the authors of the letter would be identical. It was also suggested that local compression of VA at C2 was not accounted for in our study. Again, that is correct. However, accounting for this effect would likely not change the conceptual results of our study for 2 reasons: first, arteries exposed to compressive stresses are reinforced at the places of compression; thus, compressive stresses would likely not translate into great compressive strains. Second, VA is much more strained during everyday movements than during chiropractic neck SMTs; therefore, tensile strains caused by local VA compression would likely be greater for everyday movements than neck SMTs. Finally, the authors of the letter criticize the choice of the Diversified Technique. A quick inquiry revealed that the Diversified Technique is the main technique taught at the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College; it is used by 96% of all chiropractors, and it is the primary technique taught at many US-based chiropractic colleges.3National Board of Chiropractic Examiners.in: Christensen MG Job Analysis of Chiropractic. 2000Google Scholar Therefore, we felt that our decision was feasible, probably more so than the hypothenar occiput technique mentioned by the authors of the letter. In any case, the hypothenar occiput technique requires full rotation of the patient's head, which goes against the Best Practice Guidelines that suggest minimizing neck rotations during cervical SMTs.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,600
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,133

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,496
Tête enseignante GPT0,407
Écart entre enseignants0,089 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2011
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Manipulative and Physiological TherapeuticsMême sujetSpinal Fractures and Fixation TechniquesTravaux en français237 207