Neurotrauma and Critical Care of the Spine. By JackJallo, MD, PhD, and Alexander R.Vaccaro, MD, PhD, MBA. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, 2018; 225 pp; $179.99 (hardcover)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Neurotrauma and Critical Care of the Spine is a second edition state-of-the-art text that offers the reader a comprehensive look at the complete management of spinal injuries from prehospital setting through rehabilitation. This text constitutes a wealth of information regarding the epidemiology, pathophysiology, basic science, biomechanics, physical examination, prehospital and ED management, surgical management, critical care issues, and rehabilitation of spinal injury. The authors are neurosurgical or orthopedic spine specialists, which for an emergency physician reader at times presents an issue of perspective and relevance to our specialty. The chapters flow from epidemiology to basic science to management and critical care culminating with rehabilitation issues in spinal cord injury (SCI). Some chapters, such as chapter 8 on thoracolumbar injuries, repeat concepts like prehospital management and steroid treatment and demonstrate a need for better cohesion between chapter authors. The entire book, however, is truly comprehensive with a text that generally flows. Figures, tables, illustrations, and images are plentiful, at least in the early chapters, and add significantly to the text. It would be helpful to add even a single figure/table to the pharmacology, infection, and rehabilitation chapters. It was surprising to see a number of plain radiographs instead of CT images in multiple chapters, given the trend and recommendations requiring CT to avoid missed spinal injuries. Additionally, some chapters, especially chapters 4, 11, and 14, had extremely poor-quality figures that were blurred and below average quality. Neurotrauma and Critical Care of the Spine incorporates some truly state-of-the-art concepts from leading research scientists in the field. Chapter 3 on spinal cord protective and regenerative therapies reflects the newest arguments and concepts debated in 2018 at the International Neurotrauma Society meeting. Chapter 9 does an admirable job describing the C-spine clinical clearance criteria for both NEXUS and Canadian C-spine rules. The chapter otherwise recommends CT, which neglects the fact that plain films were the “criterion standard” for both the NEXUS study and the Canadian C-spine rules. Chapter 10 on early surgery is the most comprehensive thoughtful chapter ever written on this subject. The chapter on emerging therapies for SCI is likewise up to date and well written. Unfortunately, some chapter concepts are poorly referenced and seem significantly out of date. Chapter 8 suggests using prehospital dopamine to increase peripheral tone and MAST pants to increase peripheral blood return in neurogenic shock. There is no discussion that dopamine is absolutely contraindicated in hypotensive trauma patients until hemorrhage can be ruled out and that it has the highest incidence of life-threatening side effects of all pressors. MAST pants are no longer used in the U.S. prehospital setting, and the reference for these recommendations comes from a 1987 article. Since this textbook is intended to be essential reading for “emergency specialists” the addition of an emergency physician and prehospital provider chapter author would lend an important perspective to prehospital and ED management. At times, the text contained colloquial or outdated terminology and language that contemporary professionals in emergency care may find insulting. Additionally, chapter 15 on mean arterial pressure (MAP) control does not reference multiple newer studies on MAP treatment and improvement in blunt injury outcomes but focuses on a recent reference demonstrating lack of value in penetrating injury. There is also no comment on recent pressor choice papers or discussion of complications in elderly patients. The addition of a neurotrauma-trained, critical care physician author would be valuable. Overall Neurotrauma and Critical Care of the Spine is a solid attempt to describe and update the whole spectrum of spinal injury. The textbook would have benefitted from improved printing and specialist input outside of the surgical specialties for some key chapters. Hopefully, the next edition will address these issues and become the textbook of choice for this multidisciplinary disease.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,041 | 0,031 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».