MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2914581845 · doi:10.1145/3099023

Adjunct Publication of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization

2017· paratext· en· W2914581845 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typeparatext
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiquePrivacy, Security, and Data Protection
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPersonalizationSession (web analytics)Computer scienceAdaptation (eye)Field (mathematics)World Wide WebInformation retrievalPsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Submissions were assigned to 1 TC member and received at least 3 reviews. the initial reviews were submitted, the designated TC facilitated discussion amongst reviewers in order to resolve differences and correct misunderstandings. The TC then provided a recommendation to the Program Chairs. The final decisions were based on these recommendations, the meta-reviews, and reviewer scores. A total of 131 submissions were reviewed. Out of 80 regular paper submissions, 29 were accepted (36% acceptance rate); out of 51 short paper submissions, 11 were accepted (22% acceptance rate). This year, we did not invite regular papers to be published as short papers, but instead invited them to either be included in the main proceedings as extended abstracts, or be published in the adjunct proceedings Late Breaking Results track (LBR). Six of them were published in the LBR track, and a total of 27 extended abstracts are published in the main proceedings. The program also features 3 demos, 3 theory, opinion and reflection papers and 14 late breaking results papers presented in UMAP poster session, which collectively showcase the wide spectrum of novel ideas and latest results in user modeling, adaptation and personalization. We also invited three distinguished keynote speakers, each illustrating significant issues and prospective directions for the field. Pearl Pu, School of Computer and Communication Sciences at EPFL, describes in her talk the various challenges related to understanding, detecting, and visualizing emotions in large text datasets. Jennifer Golbeck, University of Maryland, focuses on how to consider issues of privacy and consent when users cannot explicitly state their preferences, The Creepy Factor, and how to balance users concerns with the benefits personalized technology can offer. Paul De Bra, Eindhoven University of Technology, discusses in his talk After twenty-five years of user modeling and adaptation what makes us UMAP? how the field evolved, insights into where the field is headed, and the hottest topics for exploration. The conference includes a doctoral consortium that provides an opportunity for doctoral students to explore and develop their research interests under the guidance of distinguished scholars. This track received 15 submissions, of which seven were accepted as full papers and six as posters. A set of 8 workshops rounded off the program: EdRecSys: Educational Recommender Systems organized by Kurt Driessens (University of Maastricht, The Netherlands), Irena Koprinska (University of Sydney, Australia), Olga C. Santos (Spanish National University for Distance Education, Spain), Evgueni Smirnov (University of Maastricht, The Netherlands), Kalina Yacef (University of Sydney, Australia), Osmar Zaiane (University of Alberta, Canada) EvalUMAP: Towards Comparative Evaluation in User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization organized by Owen Conlan, Liadh Kelly, Kevin Koidl, Seamus Lawless, Athanasios Staikopoulos (Trinity College Dublin, Ireland) HAAPIE: Human Aspects in Adaptive and Personalized Interactive Environments organized by Panagiotis Germanakos (SAP SE, Germany), Styliani Kleanthous-Loizou (University of Cyprus, Cyprus), George Samaras (Department of Computer Science, University of Cyprus), Vania Dimitrova (University of Leeds, UK), Ben Steichen (Santa Clara University, USA) PALE: Personalization Approaches in Learning Environments organized by Milos Kravcik (RWTH Aachen University, Germany), Olga C. Santos (UNED,Spain), Jesus G. Boticario (UNED, Spain), Maria Bielikova (FIIT STUBA,Slovakia), Tomas Horvath (Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest, Hungary) PATCH: Personalized Access to Cultural Heritage organized by Liliana Ardissono (University of Torino, Italy), Cristina Gena (University of Torino, Italy), Tsvi Kuflik, (University of Haifa, Israel) SOAP: Surprise, Opposition, and Obstruction in Adaptive and Personalized Systems organized by Peter Knees (Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria), Kristina Andersen (Studio for Electro Instrumental Music, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), Alan Said (Recorded Future, Gothenburg, Sweden), and Marko Tkalcic (Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Italy) THUM: Temporal and Holistic User Modeling organized by Cataldo Musto (University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy), Amon Rapp (University of Torino, Italy), Federica Cena (University of Torino, Italy), Frank Hopfgartner (University of Glasgow), Judy Kay (University of Sidney, Australia), Giovanni Semeraro (University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy) Veronika Bogina (University of Haifa, Israel), David Konopnicki (IBM Research, Haifa, Israel), Tsvi Kuflik (University of Haifa, Israel), Bamshad Mobasher (DePaul University, Chicago, USA) WPPG: Fifty Shades of Personalization, Workshop on Personalization in Serious and Persuasive Games and Gameful Interactions organized by Elke Mattheiss (Austrian Institute of Technology), Marc Busch (Austrian Institute of Technology), Rita Orji (University of Waterloo, Canada), Gustavo F. Tondello (University of Waterloo, Canada), Andrzej Marczewski (Motivait, UK), Wolfgang Hochleitner (University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria), Michael Lankes (University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria), Manfred Tscheligi (University of Salzburg, Austria). Finally, UMAP hosted two tutorials: Semantics-Aware Techniques for Social Media Analysis, User Modeling, and Recommender Systems (half-day) by Pasquale Lops and Cataldo Musto(University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy) Designing cross-space learning analytics and personalised support (half-day) by Roberto Martinez-Maldonado (University of Technology Sydney, Australia), Abelardo Pardo (University of Sydney, Australia) and Davinia Hernandez-Leo (Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,826
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,129
Tête enseignante GPT0,343
Écart entre enseignants0,214 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

En bref

Citations20
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionTravaux en français237 207