ITP Patients in the Asia Pacific: Are They Different?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by auto-antibody induced platelet (PLT) destruction and reduced PLT production, leading to a low PLT count. The availability of robust epidemiological and clinical data on ITP in regions outside Europe and the United States is limited. The International ITP Registry is a prospective cohort study which seeks to collect epidemiological and clinical data of recently diagnosed primary ITP adult patients, predominantly from the Asia-Pacific region. The International Registry has been established for > 6 years. Aims To contrast and compare the International ITP Registry population with the Intercontinental Cooperative Immune Thrombocytopaenia Study Group Pediatric and Adult Intercontinental Registry on Chronic ITP (PARC-ITP Registry) adult population. The PARC - ITP Registry was selected as it represents a prospective cohort including newly diagnosed ITP patients, with a comparably sized adult cohort which is well established (>5 years) across the regions in which epidemiological data is already available1. Method Clinical and laboratory data from the International ITP Registry 2016 data analysis were compared with clinical and laboratory data reported for adults enrolled in the PARC-ITP registry. Results The PARC Registry had 340 adult patients enrolled in 31 countries across Europe, Canada, United States, Latin America, the Middle East, and Asia. As at 31 August 2016 514 patients had data available for the International ITP Registry from 44 sites across 10 countries. Patient characteristics are presented in Table 1. The International ITP Registry has a predominance of patients of Asian origin whereas the PARC- ITP Registry population is principally Caucasian (55% v 63%). A female predominance is seen in both cohorts. Comorbidities are reported more often in the International Registry group (34% vs 30% in PARC). Hypertension is the most often reported comorbidity in both groups. Of the comorbidities related to ITP diagnosis that are available for comparison, diabetes occurs more often in the International Registry group and gastrointestinal disease is reported at similar rates in both groups (Table 1). Mean PLT count at baseline was 32 x 109/L (range 0-99 x 109/L) in the International Registry group and 25.4 x 109/L (range 0-133 x 109/L) in the PARC Registry adults. Corticosteroids are the most frequently used first-line treatment in both groups - 76% in the International Registry and 59% in the PARC-ITP Registry adults. IVIg is used in both populations at much lower rates - 26 % in the International Registry and 6% in the PARC-ITP Registry adults. Splenectomy is uncommon, with 40 patients in our group having splenectomy, splenectomy is not reported on in the PARC-ITP Registry publication. TPO-receptor agonist use is reported in the International Registry group (n = 48) but not reported on in the PARC-ITP Registry group. Anti-D is reported both groups at rates Clinical signs of bleeding were assessed by location in both Registries. The International Registry also records severity of bleeding. Bleeding at any site was seen in 39% of patients in the International Registry whereas PARC -ITP Registry reports manifestations of bleeding in 69% of adults. Summary/Conclusion Comparative data showed similarities in gender distribution, presenting platelet counts, and diagnostic testing, whereas differences occurred in ethnicity, co-morbidity, bleeding, and first and second line therapies. References Kuhne T, et al on behalf of the Intercontinental Cooperative ITP Study Group. Newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia in children and adults: a comparative prospective observational registry of the Intercontinental Cooperative Immune Thrombocytopenia Study Group. Haematologica 2011;96(12):1831-1837. doi:10.3324/haematol.2011.050799 Disclosures Lee: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Member of advisory Boards for Novartis on Revolade ;involved in the Novartis sponsored Phase IV multicenter, observational study in Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia patients on Revolade treatment in emerging markets (CITE Study), Research Funding. Ilhan: Novartis: Consultancy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».