MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2914856252 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-118967

CD4+ T-Cell Lymphopenia in Frequent Platelet Donors Who Have Ceased Platelet Donation for at Least 1 Year

2018· article· en· W2914856252 sur OpenAlexaff
Mahboubeh Rahmani, Brooke Fortin, Nancy Berliner, Nicolas C. Issa, Donna Neuberg, Richard M. Kaufman, John M. Gansner

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueBlood donation and transfusion practices
Établissements canadiensDalhousie University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPlateletpheresisLeukoreductionMedicineApheresisPlateletDonationPlatelet transfusionInternal medicineImmunologySurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction We recently discovered that a number of frequent apheresis platelet donors at our donor center had CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts below 200 cells/µL. The cause appears to be repeated extraction of these cells by the Trima Accel Automated Blood Collection System's leukoreduction system chamber. Plateletpheresis at our donor center has been conducted exclusively with this instrument since 2006. How long CD4+ T-cell lymphopenia persists after stopping plateletpheresis is unknown. Whether there are infectious or other complications that could relate to CD4+ T-cell lymphopenia in former donors is also unknown. We therefore investigated the blood counts (including CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts) and medical histories of former platelet donors who had a history of frequent platelet donation but had stopped donating platelets for at least 12 months. Methods We mailed a questionnaire to former frequent apheresis platelet donors who had not donated platelets at our donor center for at least 12 months. Donors who replied to the questionnaire were contacted by phone to schedule a study visit. Frequent platelet donation was defined as 20-24 plateletpheresis sessions in at least one 365-day period starting in 2011. Donors who consented to participate in the study confirmed that they had not donated platelets in the prior 12 months, provided a blood sample for analysis, and completed a health questionnaire that included questions about opportunistic infections and malignancies. Medical records of these donors were also reviewed, where available. Approval for the study was obtained from the Partners HealthCare Institutional Review Board (2017P002880) and all participants provided written informed consent. Results Of 52 former frequent platelet donors identified as eligible to receive a questionnaire, one was known to have died of a myocardial infarction and another had requested not to receive communications from the donor center. Therefore, 50 potential study candidates were mailed a questionnaire. Twelve questionnaires were returned as undeliverable. Five potential study candidates returned the questionnaire but either declined to participate in the study or did not respond when contacted to schedule a study visit. Fourteen former frequent platelet donors elected to participate in the study after receiving the first mailing of the questionnaire. Of these 14 study participants, 6 were female and all were Caucasian. The median age was 65. The most common reason for ceasing platelet donation was a positive HLA antibody test (5 participants) followed by "low white blood cells," "heart trouble," and "inconvenience" (2 participants each). All former donors had tested negative for HIV while donating platelets. There were 2 participants with CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts below 200 cells/µL (Figure 1); one of these participants had prior CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts available for review. These showed that the CD4+ T-lymphocyte count in this former donor had improved slightly since ceasing donation one year earlier (Figure 2). Three study participants had a CD4+ T-lymphocyte count between 200 and 300 cells/µL. A review of prescription medications and medical problems did not identify an etiology for the low CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts. Responses to the health questionnaire showed that no study participant had ever had a severe infection, an infection with an unusual pathogen ("bug"), or thrush. Two former frequent platelet donors had a history of shingles, both of whom had CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts slightly below the normal range (441-2156 cells/µL) at the time of participation in the study. Five former donors had a history of cancer: Two episodes of squamous cell skin cancer (1 participant), papillary thyroid carcinoma (1 participant), glioblastoma (1 participant), basal cell skin cancer (1 participant), and squamous cell skin cancer as well as melanoma in situ (1 participant). Conclusion In our small cohort, there is no evidence that CD4+ T-cell lymphopenia predisposes to opportunistic infections or to malignancies classically associated with immune dysregulation. Plateletpheresis-associated CD4+ T-cell lymphopenia has improved slightly in one former frequent platelet donor a year after ceasing plateletpheresis but the count remains below 200 cells/µL. Frequent plateletpheresis involving a leukoreduction system chamber should be considered in the differential diagnosis of idiopathic CD4+ lymphopenia. Disclosures Gansner: Novimmune SA: Research Funding; UpToDate: Patents & Royalties.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,007

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,229
Écart entre enseignants0,213 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetBlood donation and transfusion practicesTravaux en français237 207