MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W291528746

Borrowing Media from around the World: School Libraries and Copyright Law

2007· article· en· W291528746 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rebecca P. Butler

Notice bibliographique

RevueSchool Libraries Worldwide · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueCopyright and Intellectual Property
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIntellectual propertyThe InternetLawSociologyClass (philosophy)Political sciencePublic relationsWorld Wide WebComputer science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This article examines worldwide copyright law from the point of view of the school librarian. Like many other countries, the United States belongs to a number of international copyright organizations involved in intellectual property issues within and beyond its boundaries. The goal of copyright compliance is considered using US intellectual property law as an example with the following questions as starting points. (a) Can students legally borrow music from the Internet to add to a class project if the selected Web site comes from a country other than their own? (b) Is it acceptable for a teacher to make class copies of an article that he or she read in a foreign journal for use in his or her classroom? (c) Are Internet entities such as blogs, wikis, and social interaction sites copyrighted? If so, how does this affect educators (and students) who use them? These examples will help readers to understand their responsibilities in relation to national and international copyright laws. Introduction Copyright law in the school library environment is a gray, cloudy entity with many interpretations. Add to this the fact that internationally there is no single copyright law, and the confusion grows. The result for countless school librarians worldwide is uncertainty and the hope that they are doing the right thing and giving the correct advice in their libraries and for their patrons: students, teachers, and administration. This article attempts to elucidate certain positions in international copyright agreements from the point of view of United States copyright law and those international organizations to which the US belongs. This article does not and cannot answer all the questions about copyright that readers of this international professional journal may have. Instead, I focus on a select number of questions and scenarios of importance to school librarians who work with students aged 5-18 in order to give examples that will help to direct readers to the sources needed for a specific issue or question. To assist readers, I also provide an overview of a number of international copyright organizations, which may influence how copyright is addressed in specific countries. The Questions Because copyright law can be such a quagmire, it is necessary to use several possible concerns of school librarians as examples from which to work. The selected questions are as follows, (a) Can students legally borrow music from the Internet to add to a class project if the selected Web site comes from a country other than their own? (b) Is it acceptable for a teacher to make class copies of an article that he or she read in a foreign journal for use in his or her classroom? (c) Are Internet entities such as blogs, wikis, and social interaction sites copyrighted? If so, how does this affect those of us (and our students) who use them? These three questions are addressed following a discussion of several of the more prominent international copyright treaties and organizations to which the US and a number of other countries belong. Selected International Copyright Treaties and Organizations There is no such thing as an 'international copyright' that will automatically protect an author's writings throughout the world (International Copyright Relations of the United States, 2007, p. 1). Instead, the national laws of various countries offer the owners or creators of works their particular versions of copyright law. With all the diverse nations in the world, this means that myriad copyright legislations apply depending on where something was created, where it was published, and so forth. Thus it can be confusing when it comes to determining who owns what, for how long, and where, if the work is used outside the country of origin. Because there is no single set of rules or laws for copyright internationally, it is arguable that a work considered in the public domain in one country might be considered copyrighted in another. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,033
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,070

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,023
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0060,006
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0150,037
Communication savante0,0330,036
Science ouverte0,0020,013
Intégrité de la recherche0,0060,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0160,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,212
Écart entre enseignants0,195 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSchool Libraries WorldwideMême sujetCopyright and Intellectual PropertyTravaux en français237 207