Living After Prison:The Experience of (Re)integration to Society After Release From an Ontario Correctional Facility
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
As individuals are released from incarceration in Ontario institutions they face a variety of barriers to their successful (re)integration.With the current reconviction rate at 44% within the first year of release, those being released quite clearly have trouble with this period of their lives.This study will therefore examine the (re)integration process at different stages, in order to understand how people cope with life after prison, and how their experiences of incarceration continue to affect them long after release.Understanding the ways that identity production and gender come to be affected by, and affect, time spent inside, and importantly the (re)integration process will give us a greater understanding of incarceration and life after.This will be achieved through ethnographic data gained throughout the fieldwork process, along with examinations of academic literature focused on identity, gender, and power.It is important for us to further understand (re)integration barriers and experiences, in order to help programming in the future.III Acknowledgments I would like to start by thanking my thesis supervisor Dr. Brian Given, who has provided me with guidance, great conversations, and an overall fantastic experience of anthropological education.I would also like to thank Dr. Kristin Bright who helped me to understand where I fit in the anthropological discipline, who was always there to talk to and to provide reassurance that I could write this thesis, and who provided such a wonderful atmosphere at Carleton University.Along with my committee, I would like to thank the other students in my cohort who made this school experience so much fun, and who were always there to chat and hang out when it was needed most.I would like to thank my family, Dirk Sr., Bonnie, Stephanie, and Jenifer who have always been so supportive, loving, and willing to listen and provide guidance when needed.Sometimes the research and writing process can be overwhelming, and having family who are as supportive as you all makes the difference.This thesis was also heavily impacted by my friends who kept me sane over the last two years.Hanging out with Courtney and Andrew has been such an important part of my life, and you two mean more to my well-being than I can ever express (at this point you should both truly be in my family section).Matt, you have always been such a supportive person in my life, and your longdistance phone calls are always reassuring.MacCuaig, Steve, Gui, Taylor, Sara T., Shaun, Genrys, Kaleb, Scott, you have all been just great people to have in my life, and I am so honoured to call you friends.Lastly, Shigeru Miyamoto, thank you for giving me such a great way to spend too much of my time.Finally, I would like to thank the most important person in my life, my lovely wife Sara.You have been there in the best times, the difficult times, and throughout the mundane times.It is so fantastic that I am able to spend my life with my best friend, who always knows how to make me laugh, and who is never afraid to say what is on her mind.I know I'm the emotional one of the two of us, and so this I why I use this space to tell you that you mean more to me than I can
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,024 | 0,010 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».