MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2916001079 · doi:10.2118/0205-0012-jpt

Comments (February 2005)

2005· article· en· W2916001079 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Donnelly

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueMarine and Offshore Engineering Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBoomPopulationEconomicsMultinational corporationSupply and demandPetroleum industryFossil fuelNatural resource economicsEconomyAgricultural economicsBusinessEngineeringFinanceMacroeconomics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Though intensely competitive, and sometimes at odds in public policy debates, the largest multinational oil and gas companies appear to be in agreement about the short-term and long-term challenges facing the industry. Recent remarks by top executives at ExxonMobil, BP, and ChevronTexaco point to an oil market that has shifted to one still dependent on hydrocarbons despite all the talk of alternative fuels and one in which sellers now have the upper hand. With oil prices above $40/bbl for much of the past year, it has been a profitable stretch for operators, but they are not dis-missive of the challenges that lie ahead. In a December speech in Canada, John Browne, Group Chief Executive of BP, explained how an oil market fearful of supply shortages evolved. Technology led to an E&P boom in the 1990s, Browne said, as advances in seismic technology reduced risk and costs, new strides in deep water opened up new areas for exploration, and reservoir-management breakthroughs enhanced recovery factors. After the oil price collapse of the late 1990s, OPEC introduced its “price band” target price of around $25/bbl and began to skillfully manage prices. That was followed by large upswings in global demand in 2003 and 2004. With the world’s surplus oil capacity rapidly shrinking, geopolitical events—in Iraq and Venezuela, for instance—and potential supply disruptions put the market on edge. Browne sees supply/demand challenges facing the industry. The world’s population continues to grow, and oil demand is rising in developing countries. And, although much public and political attention has been paid to renewable and alternative forms of energy such as wind and solar, oil and gas demand will continue to grow as hydrocarbons remain the world’s fuel of choice. The resources are there to meet that demand, Browne says, but oil trade will increase as new oil discoveries are likely to be located farther from major consuming centers. And by 2015, three regions—Russia, west Africa, and the Gulf states of the Middle East—will account for 80% of oil trade. Rex Tillerson, President of ExxonMobil Corp., also laid out his vision of the future of supply and demand issues in December at a joint meeting of the Independent Petroleum Assn. of America and the Texas Independent Producers and Royalty Owners Assn. in Houston. Energy demand will continue to increase, especially for oil and gas, which will account for about three-fifths of total energy supply. Natural gas demand will grow at a faster clip than that of oil. And, although demand for alternative forms of energy will rise over the next 2–3 decades, it will still pale in comparison to oil and gas. Oil demand in industrialized counties will grow only modestly, Tillerson said, with the real significant demand growth coming in developing countries in Asia, particularly through transportation. Energy security will remain a key concern for policymakers, but the world seems destined to become increasingly dependent on OPEC and Middle East oil supplies in the future. After 2010, the “call on OPEC crude” will require OPEC countries to add 1 million BOPD of capacity per year. Tillerson believes that enormous oil resources still exist, not only from conventional sources but from unconventional sources such as extra-heavy oil, tar sands, and shale. The industry faces huge challenges in meeting world demand growth that are highly capital intensive, he said, and governments must open their resources to development. David O’Reilly, ChevronTexaco’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, believes the industry is witnessing a “change in the basic energy equation.” In a recent speech, he noted the high global energy demand projections for places such as China and the difficulty and expense of bringing new supply sources on line. He contends the public must digest a few energy facts, including the realization that there will be a rise in demand for all types of energy sources over the next 20 years and that alternative fuels will still make up only a small slice of the demand pie in the short term. The scenarios laid out by these executives will cause little controversy in the oil and gas industry. But educating the public about the issues surrounding future energy supply and demand may be as difficult as bringing those supplies to market.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,459
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,443

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,004
Tête enseignante GPT0,198
Écart entre enseignants0,194 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Petroleum TechnologyMême sujetMarine and Offshore Engineering StudiesTravaux en français237 207