Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Alberta Environment undertook the collection, consolidation and analysis of pesticide sales data from pesticide vendors in Alberta for the 2003 calendar year.The objective was to document the volume and types of pesticides sold in Alberta, and to prepare a general overview of the sales data in relation to sectors of use, types of use, individual active ingredients, chemical groupings, as well as geographic breakdowns by river basin and municipality.This project is an ongoing survey conducted every five years, with previous reports being done for 1993 and 1998.The 1998 report followed the chemical grouping format used by Quebec in their reporting on pesticide sales in their province, and with the proposed National Pesticide Sales Database, however the 2003 report also includes individual active ingredient sales information.Pesticide sales data was requested from registered pesticide vendors and wholesalers in Alberta in early 2004, under the authority of the Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act and supporting regulations.Approximately 92% compliance with the sales data request was obtained.Sales data received was digitized or reformatted to a common database format.Six additional datasets were constructed to assist with sorting and categorizing the sales records by chemical or geographic groups.The datasets were brought into Microsoft Access, where they were linked and various queries were performed.In 2003, a total of 9 264 487.7 kg of pesticide active ingredient (ai) was sold in, or shipped into.Alberta.Pesticides sold into the Agriculture sector accounted for 96.2% of all pesticides sold, with the Commercial/Industrial sector accounting for 3.1% of sales, and the Domestic sector accounting for 0.6% of sales.The types of pesticides sold were predominantly herbicides, at 77.3%.Adjuvants and surfactants made up the next largest category at 14.6%.Insecticides made up 4.7% of sales, while fungicides made up 3.4% of sales.Of the chemical groups, the Phosphonic Acids, Phosphinic Acids group was the largest at 38.1% of overall sales.Sales in this group were made up primarily of glyphosate.However, in the Domestic sector, the Phenoxy Acids group dominated with 35.2% of pesticide active ingredient (mainly 2,4-D) sold.Looking at geographic distribution of sales by outlet location related to major river drainage, sales in the Oldman River basin were highest overall at 21 .4% of the total, followed by sales within the Red Deer River basin at 17.6%, the North Saskatchewan River basin at 15.0%, and the Battle River basin at 14.6%.Pesticide sales were also sorted by natural regions.The Grassland Natural Region constituted over 46% of all pesticide sales, mainly in the Dry Mixedgrass and Mixedgrass sub regions.The Parkland Natural Region contained almost 39% of provincial pesticide sales, mainly in the Central Parkland sub-region.The i
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».