MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W291698820

Pecking at Your Head: The Flight and Fall of 'Magpie'

2005· article· en· W291698820 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rosemary Nursey-Bray

Notice bibliographique

RevueAustralasian drama studies · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueTheatre and Performance Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDramaPoliticsMedia studiesQuarter (Canadian coin)NothingSloganPecking orderHistorySociologyManagementVisual artsLawPolitical scienceArt
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

'Magpie' was the name of the company run by the South Australian Theatre Company (SATC)1 for children and young people for a quarter of a century. Magpie's embryonic form, the Saturday Company, was founded in 1972; the company hatched as Magpie in 1976, was reincarnated as Magpie2 in 1997, and was 'killed off' at the end of that year. In a theatrical arena, the company created a formidable canon of new work and made a respected contribution to the dcvclopmenl of innovative theatre forms; in the educational arena, the company offered an array of broad-ranging and specific programmes in drama-in-education (DIE)2 and theatre-in-cducation (TIE) ; in a social and political arena, major issues were reflected and addressed by Magpie. Funded by the Australia Council and considered a 'wing' of the parent company, Magpie's artistic directors had autonomy in programming until 1994 and enjoyed access, together with the main-stage 'Playhouse' company, to the technical facilities of the SATC. Records, which were not always kept, show that over a quarter of a million people witnessed Magpie performances, although the real total could be much higher. It can be said with confidence that Magpie was an influential company in the development of theatre for young people Australia-wide. There were nine artistic directors during the life-span of Magpie; Geoffrey Rush, the fourth, coined the phrase, 'Pecking at Your Head' as his company slogan. He believed: Theatre as a function or an event is nothing like school, nor should it be. It's got to be something that comes in, cuts a swathe through the minds of the children - pecks at their heads.4 Theatre for the young was not to be just an entertaining experience - although entertainment came first - nor educational to the detriment of fun and theatricality, but a thrilling and stimulating occurrence that made some kind of impact on the minds and emotions of the young. The other directors of Magpie subscribed to this philosophy each in his or her own way. The shift of focus within this parameter, as each successive Director explored a unique vision, provides a rare overview of a multiplicity of approaches to Theatre for Young People.5 Magpie is hatched and goes 'On the Wing' (1972-1983) The SATC established a Youth Activities branch in 1972; Helmut Bakaitis was appointed as its director and remained until 1976. His approach was political, influenced by the radical Melbourne theatrical environment from which he emerged and informed by the educational ideas promulgated in Britain by Peter Slade, Brian Way and in particular, Dorothy Heathcote. He established the Saturday Company - a youth theatre6 company - and the Youth Activities Team, which functioned as a drama-in-education team focusing on upper primary children. Bakaitis believed in the developmental potential of drama as a methodology in the education of the whole person and as a strategy to help children understand and question the world around them, reflect upon it, accept it, or see a need for reform. Eighty teenagers from across Adelaide formed the first Saturday Company. Bakaitis was offered Carclew as a venue, an old Adelaide mansion of considerable architectural beauty and interest with a large garden. The company devised street theatre, a rock'n'roll cabaret and 'happenings' for Adelaide's biennial Come Out Festival for children. The first of two full-scale productions was The Lay of Sir Orfeo (1975), a project linked to the curriculum and the study of Middle English. Based on the medieval narrative poem, the company worked on the development of the presentation for nearly a year under Bakaitis' direction.7 The stage of the newly built Space Theatre was opened into the huge workshop behind, forming an immense performance venue which broke completely away from proscenium-framed theatre and offered innovative opportunities for actor/audience integration. The company constructed the city of Winchester out of cardboard, with stages set all around the 'town' (the SATC provided professional designers to aid the young people). …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,819
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,673

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,066
Tête enseignante GPT0,298
Écart entre enseignants0,232 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAustralasian drama studiesMême sujetTheatre and Performance StudiesTravaux en français237 207