Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Technology Focus In last year’s Offshore Facilities Technology Focus (February 2012), we highlighted the increasingly important role that constructive collaboration plays in facilitating delivery of successful field-development outcomes in increasingly challenging environments. In this edition, we illustrate the vital importance of innovative technological advances in enabling some of these challenging field developments that would otherwise not be technically feasible. Operators have generally tended to shy away from the upsides available by embracing new technology for fear of incurring downsides from suboptimal performance of the technology. This has inevitably slowed down the whole cycle of investment in, and adoption of, commercially advantageous technology to the ultimate detriment of the industry as a whole. It also certainly has tarnished our industry’s attractiveness to bright young engineers of the future. An interesting shift, however, has been evident in recent years. There have been a growing number of instances whereby operators have been unable to implement potentially lucrative field developments without adopting technology that they would hitherto have deemed to be inadequately proven by others. In the overwhelming majority of such cases, where the desire to implement the field development has overridden the reluctance to adopt the necessary new technology, the outcomes have been successful. A couple of key characteristics underpin these successes. One of those is constructive collaboration, which we have already touched on. The other is ensuring that both the nature and the dimensions of the associated technology-implementation challenges are properly understood and that the efforts established to overcome the challenges are realistically resourced to achieve success. Very few operators are large enough to have the necessary specialist resources available in house for planning and executing such projects with demonstrable confidence that success will be delivered. However, those resources are still readily available to any operator for any desired duration if the appetite is there to enter into a collaborative venture for achieving the available upsides. I hope you enjoy the opportunity to read how one operator is taking advantage of multiple recent technological advancements to complement an innovative commercial approach in transforming a hitherto unviable discovery into a fully viable field development. We also take a look at some other ongoing technological advances that have the potential to change the way we will do business in years ahead. Please let me also take this opportunity to remind interested readers of the new sister SPE publication Oil and Gas Facilities, in which many more aspects of offshore facilities are explained and discussed. Your feedback on how you would like to see that publication evolve would be very much welcomed. Recommended additional reading at OnePetro: www.onepetro.org. OTC 23365 Autonomous Inspection Vehicle, A New Dimension in Life of Field Operations by James Jamieson, Subsea 7, et al.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».