MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2917317522 · doi:10.5326/jaaha-ms-6741

2017 AAHA Canine Vaccination Guidelines*

2017· article· en· W2917317522 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the American Animal Hospital Association · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiqueRabies epidemiology and control
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineVaccinationProtocol (science)Family medicineTask forceAlternative medicinePathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The American Animal Hospital Association (AAHA) is pleased to introduce this revision of the Canine Vaccination Guidelines published, for the first time, as an online educational resource for the veterinary medical profession. This format will allow for frequent online updates as necessary. The revised AAHA Canine Vaccination Guidelines offer important updates to the 2011 Guidelines. The content of the Guidelines has been significantly expanded to facilitate efforts by practicing veterinarians to meet patient and client needs in a complex infectious disease environment. The Guidelines are an authoritative source of evidence-based recommendations and expert opinion provided by the AAHA Canine Vaccination Guidelines Task Force. The Task Force includes individuals with extensive experience in primary care practice, academia, shelter medicine, public health, and veterinary law related to clinical practice.While there is often consensus on which canine vaccines fall into core and noncore categories and when they should be administered, in practice, the vaccination protocol should always be individualized based on the patient’s risk factors, life stage, and lifestyle. For this reason, these Guidelines are not intended to represent a universal vaccination protocol applicable to all dogs. Instead, the Guidelines offer a range of recommendations that will aid practitioners in making rational decisions on vaccine selection for their individual patients.The AAHA Canine Vaccination Guidelines offer important updates to previously published guidelines as well as new, relevant information that directly impacts the practicing veterinarian:As one of the safest and most cost-effective means of infectious disease prevention, vaccination has long been a focal point of canine practice. This revision of the entire AAHA Canine Vaccination Guidelines is presented in an online format at aaha.org/CanineVaccinationGuidelines. Termed an “Online Educational Resource,” this iteration of the AAHA Canine Vaccination Guidelines offers readers immediate accessibility to current, “must-know” information that directly impacts clinical practice on a daily basis.The table on vaccination recommendations in practice is an up-to-date, master reference that functions as a stand-alone resource covering all commercially available canine vaccines licensed in the United States and Canada. Core and noncore vaccines are listed along with recommendations for revaccination intervals and various precautions. The table contains links to sections in the Guidelines that provide additional, relevant detail. This is the only section available in print in JAAHA. The remainder of the sections listed below can be found at aaha.org/CanineVaccinationGuidelines.Rabies vaccines are the only vaccines administered by veterinarians that are required by law. Because rabies laws may vary from state to state (or jurisdictions within states), a new section on rabies vaccination provides access to current state-by-state information on rabies and rabies vaccination law, and regulations that directly impact decisions veterinarians make in practice.Another new section offers recommendations for dogs that are overdue for vaccination. Vaccine-specific guidance is provided for what is often an ambiguous aspect of veterinary practice, i.e., the canine patient that presents with an unknown or out-of-date vaccination history. Recommendations for core and noncore vaccines are presented.Shelter-housed dogs represent a sizeable population of animals at increased risk of exposure to vaccine-preventable infectious diseases. The Guidelines include an updated table on recommendations for vaccination of shelter-housed dogs, including those in long-term housing facilities.Another novel component of the Guidelines is a section on antibody testing (serology) as an adjunct to vaccination. Information is included that addresses not only the indications for testing, but also provides recommended actions based on whether the test results are “positive” or “negative.” Antibody testing represents a selective approach to assessing an individual dog’s response to vaccination. Determination of antibody status is especially relevant for the assessment of patients that have an unknown vaccination history, are overdue for vaccination, those undergoing chemotherapy, those receiving immunosuppressive drugs, as well as patients with a history of vaccine adverse reactions.As noted in the section on legal considerations, veterinarians can exercise some professional discretion in deviating from vaccine label recommendations, such as determining appropriate revaccination intervals based the patient’s risk. On the other hand, the protocol for administering rabies vaccinations is not discretionary. Decisions surrounding the administration of rabies vaccines require strict adherence to statutory requirements.The section on vaccine storage and handling summarizes “must know” information related to the storage and use of vaccines within the practice. Included are tips for avoiding misidentification of vaccines, monitoring storage conditions, and the consequences of subjecting vaccines to out-of-range temperatures. A link to comprehensive Center for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines for proper vaccine storage and handling of vaccines is provided.Immunotherapeutic products represent a rapidly emerging class of biologics licensed for use in veterinary medicine. The Guidelines include a new section entitled therapeutic biologics specifically directed at informing veterinarians about the availability and intended use of these novel adjunctive immune-based therapies.In the section on frequently asked questions, readers will find informative recommendations for dealing with an assortment of commonly encountered, vaccine-related situations seen in clinical practice.The AAHA Canine Vaccination Guidelines support the implementation of effective, individualized pathways for the prevention of infectious diseases of dogs. Implicit in the Guidelines is the integral role vaccination plays in the veterinary profession’s emphasis on preventive healthcare and regular exams as the foundation of a long, active, and rewarding relationship between pets and their human companions. To read these guidelines in their entirety, visit aaha.org/CanineVaccinationGuidelines.NOTE: Vaccines designated as CORE should be administered to all dogs. However, because exposure risk to vaccine-preventable disease varies, selected NONCORE vaccines may be recommended as CORE in individual practices depending on geographic region, patient lifestyle, age, etc.The following citations apply to the “Vaccination Recommendations—Practice” table.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,267
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,716

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,299
Écart entre enseignants0,283 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle