Christiana Care Health System, Newark-Wilmington, DEDeveloping a Resident Quality & Safety Council: Integrating Reporting and Improvement Science into Daily Work
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Christiana Care, a major teaching hospital, provides the clinical learning environment for more than 270 residents/fellows in 13 residency programs. Our vision is that all residents will demonstrate that patient safety is a part of their profession. However, we found that although many residents observe safety events, few personally report them ( Methods: The Resident Quality & Safety Council consists of faculty-resident dyads for all of our residency programs that were nominated by chairs and program directors. The council serves as a vehicle for enhancing communication between hospital committees and clinical departments and provides a forum for teaching safety concepts, discussing/disseminating specific system efforts, developing new initiatives, collaborating across departments, participating in safety activities, reviewing data, and providing feedback and solutions for system-level concerns. The council meets monthly for 1.5 hours with the assignment of between-session activities. Each session typically includes didactics, discussion of events/event reporting, reports of dyad-driven quality and safety activities/findings, and advice or consultation on system-level initiatives. The council reports activities to the system9s GMEC and Safety Committee. Key measures of effectiveness included reporting climate data, resident participation in committees/councils, and percent change in self-reported attitudes about patient safety. Results: In the quarter when the AIAMC NI IV project began (October 1, 2013–December 13, 2013), we had 56 resident-submitted Safety First Learning Reports (SFLRs). In the first quarter of 2014, the number increased to 76 resident-submitted SFLRs. The number of resident-submitted SFLRs dipped to 59 in the second quarter of 2014, but rose to 71 and 82 in the third and fourth quarters of 2014, respectively. The GME log of resident participation in health system forums showed a 75% increase in the number of residents participating in root cause analyses (RCAs) and debriefs in June 2014–February 2015 compared to the June 2013–February 2014 time period. According to the risk management event reporting system, the number of resident-submitted events increased 167% from the first measure of January 2013–December 2013 to the second measure of January 2014–December 2014. Safety attitudes remained relatively the same. Conclusions: During our study period, we were able to demonstrate more than a 2-fold increase in the total number of resident-submitted SFLRs. Faculty-resident dyad participation not only enabled effective dissemination of quality and safety initiatives within and between programs but also strengthened mentoring relationships.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,032 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,008 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle