The Management of Peripheral Vascular Aneurysms: Present and Future Options
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This thematic issue of International Journal of Angiology presents an update on the management of peripheral vascular aneurysms. The objectives of this issue are to discuss the recent developments in epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment modalities of peripheral vascular aneurysms. This review will be of benefit to surgeon, health care professionals, and patients. Drs. Tanner I. Kim and Bauer Sumpio focus on the management of asymptomatic popliteal artery aneurysms (PAA). Popliteal artery aneurysms are the most common peripheral artery aneurysm. They are frequently symptomatic and are associated with high morbidity and limb loss. Asymptomatic PAAs have the likelihood of becoming symptomatic with rates of 70% within 5 years. The management of PAAs include open and endovascular approaches. Endovascular intervention has led to an increase in stent graft replacement for PAAs and challenged the open repair approach. Presently open surgical repair is the preferred choice for repair of asymptomatic PAAs, provided there is venous conduit available in younger active patients without significant comorbidities. Endovascular repair is appropriate for patients with good venous conduit, or in older patients with several comorbidities. They suggest a randomized controlled trial with long-term follow-up is needed to identify patients who would benefit most from either treatment option. Drs. Maen Aboul Hosn and John D. Corson et al present in depth, the incidence, pathophysiology, clinical signs and symptoms, diagnosis and management of visceral artery aneurysms, including celiac artery, hepatic artery, splenic artery, superior mesenteric artery, inferior mesenteric artery, pancreatic duodenal artery, and gastroduodenal artery aneurysms. They describe that visceral artery aneurysms are rare. Ruptured visceral artery aneurysms have a high mortality rate. Management of visceral artery aneurysms include open endovascular or hybrid approaches, and improved and refined endovascular techniques. Minimally invasive approaches are now a dependable option for the management of visceral artery aneurysms. Long- term follow-up is needed to confirm the preference of endovascular procedures compared with open surgical procedures in appropriately selected cases. Drs. Jon C. Henry and Randall W. Franz have provided an excellent review on peripheral arterial pseudoaneurysms. They have provided an overview on the epidemiology, natural history, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of pseudoaneurysms. The treatment modalities include: observation and surveillance, ultrasound guided-compression, ultrasound-guided thrombin injection, endovascular intervention, and open surgery and their risk benefits. Treatment modalities depend upon the condition of the patient and characteristics of the pseudoaneurysms. They suggest that follow-up is required to ensure continued thromboembolism. Drs. Cody Jo K. Kraemer and Wei Zhou have given in detail an update on the carotid artery aneurysm and its treatment. They report that carotid artery aneurysm is a rare disease estimated to be 0.1–2.0% of all carotid procedures and accounts for 0.4–4.0% of all peripheral arterial aneurysms. They have provided in detail the etiology, clinical presentation, and treatment. The treatment modalities include; medical therapy, surgical approach, and endovascular approach. Open surgical intervention has been the mainstay treatment for carotid aneurysms for years but currently an endovascular approach has been shown to be very effective. These authors in the end state that there are no clear guidelines, expert consensus, or treatment algorithm for the treatment of carotid artery aneurysms. Dr. K. Nishimura and his colleagues present an interesting case of a ruptured deep femoral artery, initially confused with incarcerated inguinal hernia. They report an old man presented to the hospital with a painful mass in the right groin. He had several spells of unconsciousness. This mass looked like an incarcerated inguinal hernia. After numerous diagnostic tests, a diagnosis of a ruptured deep femoral artery aneurysm was made. The treatment included replacement of the deep femoral artery with ePTFE graft. Postoperative course was uneventful. Patient died 13 months after operation. Dr. A. Ettorre et al present a rare case of renal artery pseudoaneurysm a serious complication after partial nephrectomy. They describe a female patient who underwent an open partial nephrectomy and developed sepsis. The patient was transferred to the department of angiology. A diagnosis of renal artery pseudoaneurysm was made after numerous diagnostic tests. Various treatments were given to the patient and patient recovered. The authors concluded that partial nephrectomy may lead to renal artery pseudoaneurysm. We sincerely thank to all authors for their contribution of excellent articles in this thematic issue, and greatly appreciate the reviewers for their time, critical comments, and helpful suggestions. We deeply appreciate the immense support of Denise M. Rossignol, Executive Director, International College of Angiology, and Managing Editor, International Journal of Angiology , in completing this task.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».