MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2918032742 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-111791

The Highly Prevalent Deletions in F8 Intron 13 Found in French Mild Haemophilia a Patients Result of Both Founder Effect and Recurrent De Novo Events

2018· article· en· W2918032742 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Yohann Jourdy, Mathilde Frétigny, Fanny Lassalle, David Lillicrap, Claude Négrier, Patrice Bouvagnet, Christine Vinciguerra

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemophilia Treatment and Research
Établissements canadiensQueen's University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHaemophiliaHaemophilia AIntronHaplotypeFounder effectGeneticsBiologyGenotypeGeneInternal medicineMedicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Genetic variations that are found at a relatively high frequency can be the consequence of a founder effect or repeated de novo events. Recently, our group has identified an intronic deletion, c.2113+461_2113+473del [DEL13T], in the F8 intron 13, in two mild haemophilia A patients. This deletion removed a part of the poly(T)-tail from the right arm of antisens AluY element and led to AluY exonisation. Then, deletions in the poly(T)-tail of AluY in F8 intron 13, from 10 to 14 pb in size, were found in approximately 6% of all cases of mild haemophilia in France. Aim: In this study, we determined whether these highly prevalent deletions are the result of recurrent molecular mechanism or of a founder effect. Methods: Haplotype reconstruction was performed after analysis of F8 extragenic and intragenic polymorphic markers in 71 unrelated French mild haemophilia A patients carrying a deletion in the poly(T)-tail of AluY in F8 intron 13 (c.2113+460_2113+473del [DEL14T] n=1; DEL13T, n=62; c.2113+462_2113+473del [DEL12T], n=2; c.2113+463_2113+473del [DEL11T], n=5 and c.2113+464_2113+473del, n=1 [DEL10T]) and in 50 non-haemophilia A subjects. The ESTIAGE tool was used to estimate the age of the DEL13T. Nineteen genetically unresolved mild Haemophilia A patients from Queen's University, Canada, were also included in the study. All patients and controls gave informed consent for genetic studies. Results: Two intragenic (STR13 and STR22) and 3 extragenic (DXS8061, ST14 and DF2) microsatellites were investigated in the DNA of the 71 mild haemophilia A patients. This set of polymorphisms markers covered a genomic region of 2,779,113 nucleotides (4.17 cM). Among the 62 patients carrying the DEL13T, 60 patients had the same allele for the marker directly flanking the deletion on the centromeric side (STR13, genetic distance 0.0062 cM). Two of them differed from the others at the next centromeric maker STR22 (genetic distance 0.2047 cM) and 20 patients differed from the others at ST14 (genetic distance 3.4237 cM). On the telomeric side, only 8 patients differed from the others at DF2 (genetic distance 0.0292 cM). None of control individuals shared such haplotypes with these 60 patients. These results provided evidence that the founder effect hypothesis was very plausible for the variant DEL13T. The ESTIAGE tool estimated that the DEL13T occurred about 61 generations ago (95% CI : 51-74 generations). Assuming that a generation spanned 25 years, the French common ancestor carrying the c.2113+461_2113+473del was estimated to have lived between the 2th and the 8th century. However, two patients carrying the DEL13T and 9 patients carrying the other deletions (DEL10T, DEL11T, DEL12T and DEL14T) had a different haplotype suggesting that these deletions arose independently. In order to support the hypothesis of a recurrent molecular mechanism, we have investigated the presence of these deletions in other geographies. F8 intron 13 deletions were found in 3/19 Canadian patients included in this study (DEL13T, n=2 and DEL10T, n=1). Haplotype analysis performed in these three patients suggested a de novo mechanism for two of them. Conclusion: This study supports both a founder effect for the c.2113+461_2113+473del in the French mild haemophilia A patients and a recurrent molecular mechanism leading to deletion in the poly(T)-tail of AluY in F8 intron 13. We recommended that these deletions be specifically investigated in all mild haemophilia A patients in whom no genetic abnormality has been detected by standard genetic analysis. Finally, these results suggest that large poly(T)-tail of inverted Alu elements may be a mutational hot spot and such deletions leading to alu-exonization, could occur in other genes. Disclosures Negrier: Sobi/Bioverativ: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Alnylam: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; LFB: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxalta/Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,008

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,307
Écart entre enseignants0,289 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetHemophilia Treatment and Research→Travaux en français237 207→