Collection of data on belowground plant biomass and morphological root parameters in the Jena Experiment
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This collection contains measurements of standing below ground biomass, belowground biomass productivity and morphological root parameters measured on the Main Experiment plots of a large grassland biodiversity experiment (the Jena Experiment; see further details below). In the Main Experiment, 82 grassland plots of 20 x 20 m were established from a pool of 60 species belonging to four functional groups (grasses, legumes, tall and small herbs). In May 2002, varying numbers of plant species from this species pool were sown into the plots to create a gradient of plant species richness (1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 60 species) and functional richness (1, 2, 3, 4 functional groups). Since 2010, plots were weeded three times per year.The following series of datasets are contained in this collection:1. Standing below ground biomass: Coarse and fine root biomass was measured in 2003, 2004, 2006 and 2008 in 0 - 30 cm depth. In 2011 and 2014, total root biomass was sampled down to 40 cm depth. Some years report the data divided into sublayers. Every year, several soil cores were taken per plot and pooled before the whole bulk material or a subsample was washed for roots. Roots were dried at 60 - 70 °C and weighed. Standing root biomass was calculated as g m-2.2. Below ground biomass productivity in 0 - 30 cm depth: Coarse and fine root biomass production from June to September 2003, September 2003 to July 2004 and July 2007 to June 2008 was measured by the ingrowth core method. In 2008, the data is reported divided into sublayers. Each time, five soil cores were taken per plot and replaced by root free soil from the field site. The initially root-free ingrowth cores were removed after a while and pooled plot-wise. To extract the newly formed roots, a subsample of the bulk material was washed for roots. Roots were dried at 70 °C and weighed. Root biomass productivity was calculated as g m-2. In addition, C- (only in 2003 and 2004) and N-concentration of the fine roots was determined.3. Morphological root parameters of newly formed roots in 0 - 30 cm depth: Root length density and mean root diameter of newly formed roots from June to September 2003 and September 2003 to July 2004 were measured by the ingrowth core method. Each time, five soil cores were taken per plot and replaced by root free soil from the field site. The initially root-free ingrowth cores were removed after a while and pooled plot-wise. To extract the newly formed roots, a subsample of the bulk material was washed and scanned. Root length and mean diameter were determined by using WinRhizo (Regent Instruments, Quebec, Canada).4. Morphological root parameters of standing roots in 0 - 30 cm depth: In 2004, mean diameter of standing roots was measured by sampling three soil cores per plot. To extract the standing roots, a subsample of the bulk material was washed and scanned. Mean diameter was determined by using WinRhizo (Regent Instruments, Quebec, Canada).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».