A191 HCV SCREENING VIA RAPID POINT OF CARE TESTING IN PATIENTS ON OPIATE SUBSTITUTION THERAPY IN PEEL REGION, CANADA
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Chronic Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection can lead to cirrhosis, liver failure and liver cancer. HCV is among the most burdensome infectious diseases in Canada, and it is estimated that up to half of infected people are unaware of their infection. Recent data has demonstrated that HCV infected patients who are actively injecting drugs (PWID) or on opiate substitution therapy (OST) have excellent outcomes with new direct-acting antiviral therapy. However, patients on OST remain vulnerable in obtaining access to timely, and unprejudiced diagnostic testing for HCV. The standard-of-care (SOC) in Ontario for diagnosis is for patients to obtain a provincial lab requisition and submit a blood sample for HCV antibodies. Barriers to HCV care include a) invasive nature of procuring sample, b) result turnaround time, c) lack of physician awareness and referral network, and d) lost-to-follow up in this high-risk population. Novel approaches are required for education among healthcare workers for vulnerable populations, and patients themselves. Rapid, non-invasive, point-of-care (POC) HCV testing and diagnosis would better align real-world strategies with these goals. We sought to investigate trends in the SOC vs POC with respect to diagnosis and linkage to care in patients on OST at 3 clinics in Peel Region, Ontario. We hypothesized that patients with a positive HCV antibody obtained via the OraQuick® POC test will have increased linkage to care outcomes regarding their possible infection. We used a commercially available POC HCV rapid antibody test (OraQuick®) that has high specificity and sensitivity in detecting HCV antibodies. Subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive either SOC or POC test. 40 (100%) of oral POC swabs conducted tested negative for HCV. Blood results were received for 7 of 40 (18%) patients in the SOC cohort, all negative for HCV. Of 80 patients enrolled in the study, 32% were female. Canadian-born patients accounted for 67% of subjects, 19% were born in India. 62% of patients were unaware of their HCV status, whereas 38% were aware of a previous negative HCV Ab result. 12/23 patients on OST enrolled from one clinic had no history of injection drug use. The proportion of patients for whom HCV Ab results were available was greater in POC than SOC (100% vs 18%). All patients for whom results have been received have tested negative and therefore no linkage opportunity was triggered. The suspected prevalence of HCV Ab in the Canadian population is approximately 1%; therefore, it was surprising that in a marginalized population with significant risk factors for HCV infection no cases were identified; perhaps due to the small sample size, or lower incidence of injection drug use. The study demonstrated that POC testing uptake worked well as a rapid screening method versus the SOC. Figure 1: Operating Protocol Gilead Sciences Canada
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».