MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2921259995 · doi:10.1111/1541-4329.12108

Food Science Education Publications and Websites

2017· article· en· W2921259995 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Food Science Education · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueDietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGeneral partnershipCurriculumResource (disambiguation)Food and drug administrationMedical educationWeb resourceNutrition EducationPublic relationsMedicinePsychologyComputer scienceBusinessPedagogyPolitical scienceEnvironmental healthGerontologyWorld Wide Web

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

New Resource for Educators from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) partnership. I described the educational partnership of the FDA and NSTA in a previous column (JFSE 14(3):67–9. doi: 10.1111/1541-4329.12064). An addition to the curriculum materials has been made available through this program, titled Science and Our Food Supply: Using the Nutrition Facts Label to Make Healthy Food Choices (2015 Edition). The site (https://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodScienceResearch/ToolsMaterials/ucm2006976.htm) described this resource as “nutrition-based curriculum introduces students to the fundamentals of healthy food choices, using the Nutrition Facts Label as the starting point, and may be used separately or in conjunction with the food safety curriculum. With engaging hands-on activities, students will become aware of calories, serving size, and the nutrients to get ‘more of’ and ‘less of.’ Designed for use by middle-level teachers, the emphasis is on an inquiry approach that is customizable to science, health, and/or family and consumer science classes, aligning with current education standards in these curriculum areas.” This 42-page resource is available free of charge at: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/FoodScienceResearch/ToolsMaterials/UCM483350.pdf. It is designed to be used either as a stand-alone resource, or to be used in conjunction with other resources available from the partnership. The resource is divided into 3 modules: introducing the nutrition facts label, nutrients to get less of, and nutrients to get more of. It also includes student worksheets, a glossary, and other resources. Al-Shabib NA, Husain FM, and Khan JM. 2017. Study on food safety concerns, knowledge and practices among university students in Saudi Arabia. Food Control 73:202-8. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.08.005 Baser F, Ture H, Abubakirova A, Sanlier N, and Cil B. 2017. Structural modeling of the relationship among food safety knowledge, attitude and behavior of hotel staff in Turkey. Food Control 73:438-44. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.08.032 Bird CL and McClelland JW. 2017. Educating limited resource older adults for better choices to lower risk of food insecurity. International Journal of Consumer Studies 41(2):225-33. doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12333 Bruijn GJd, Minh Hao N, Rhodes RE, and Osch Lv. 2017. Effects of preparatory and action planning instructions on situation-specific and general fruit and snack intake. Appetite 108:161-70. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.09.016 Burgermaster M, Gray HL, Tipton E, Contento I, and Koch P. 2017. Testing an Integrated Model of Program Implementation: the Food, Health & Choices School-Based Childhood Obesity Prevention Intervention Process Evaluation. Prevention Science 18(1):71-82. doi: 10.1007/s11121-016-0736-2 Burton M, Reid M, Worsley A, and Mavondo F. 2017. Food skills confidence and household gatekeepers' dietary practices. Appetite 108:183-90. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.09.033 Bustos N, Olivares S, Leyton B, Cano M, and Albala C. 2016. Impact of a school-based intervention on nutritional education and physical activity in primary public schools in Chile (KIND) programme study protocol: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health 16:1217. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3878-z Carvalho Rossi MdS, Stedefeldt E, da Cunha DT, and de Rosso VV. 2017. Food safety knowledge, optimistic bias and risk perception among food handlers in institutional food services. Food Control 73:681-8. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.09.016 Cooper MJ, Mezzabotta L, and Murphy J. 2017. Food and Culinary Knowledge and Skills: Perceptions of Undergraduate Dietetic Students. Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research 78(1):42-4. doi: 10.3148/cjdpr-2016-026 Corona Flores JD. 2016. Implementation of Distance Education from Face to Face Education of an Engineering Program in Science and Food Technology: A Literature Review. Redu-Revista De Docencia Universitaria, 14(1):179-201. doi: 10.4995/redu.2016.5805 Courtney SM, Majowicz SE, and Dubin JA. 2016. Food safety knowledge of undergraduate students at a Canadian university: results of an online survey. BMC Public Health 16:1147. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3818-y da Veiga Soares Carvalho MC, Tavares de Medeiros MA,g Magalhaes Bosi ML, and Prado SD. 2016. Critical thinking: the better tool for food and nutrition education. Revista De Nutricao-Brazilian Journal of Nutrition 29(6):753-4. doi: 10.1590/1678-98652016000600018e Dave JM, Thompson DI, Svendsen-Sanchez A, McNeill LH, and Jibaja-Weiss M. 2017. Development of a Nutrition Education Intervention for Food Bank Clients. Health Promotion Practice 18(2):221-8. doi: 10.1177/1524839916681732 Esfarjani F, Hosseini H, Mohammadi-Nasrabadi F, Abadi A, Roustaee R, Alikhanian H, Khaksar R. 2016. Development of a home food safety questionnaire based on the PRECEDE model: targeting Iranian women. Journal of Food Protection 79(12):2128-35. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-16-029 Ewry DM, and Fryling MJ. 2016. Evaluating the High-Probability Instructional Sequence to Increase the Acceptance of Foods with an Adolescent with Autism. Behavior Analysis in Practice 9(4):380-3. doi: 10.1007/s40617-015-0098-4 Fernandes Davies V, Kupek E, Faria Di Pietro P, Altenburg de Assis MA, Gk Vieira F, Perucchi C, Baranowski T. 2016. Qualitative Analysis of Cognitive Interviews With School Children: A Web-Based Food Intake Questionnaire. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 2(2):e167. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.5024 Filimonau V, Lemmer C, Marshall D, and Bejjani G. 2017. ‘Nudging’ as an architect of more responsible consumer choice in food service provision: The role of restaurant menu design. Journal of Cleaner Production 144:161-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.010 Francis CA, Jensen ES, Lieblein G, and Breland TA. 2017. Agroecologist education for sustainable development of farming and food systems. Agronomy Journal 109(1):23-32. doi: 10.2134/agronj2016.05.0267 Galan C, Sava N, Florescu GD, Mihaila D, Nedianu CE, and Sgem. 2016. Professional Education Evaluation of Students for Integration on the Labour Market in Agri-Food and Agro-Touristic Sector. Ecology, Economics, Education and Legislation Conference Proceedings, Sgem 2016, Vol Iii (pp. 955–61). doi: 10.5593/SGEM2016/B53/S22.122 Gills SMH, Baker SS, and Auld G. 2016. Collection Methods for the 24-Hour Dietary Recall as Used in the Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2016.10.009 Goodyear SN, Asiedu SK, and Grant JJW. 2016. The Chef's Garden: an agricultural science model-based practicum. In McConchie R, Jones B, Stanley J, Batt P, and Drew R (Editors). Acta Horticulturae 69–75. Doi: DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1126.8 Guadagnin SC, Nakano EY, Dutra ES, Carvalho KMBd, and Ito MK. 2016. Workplace nutrition knowledge questionnaire: psychometric validation and application. British Journal of Nutrition 116(9):1546-52. doi: 10.1017/s000711451600355x Harmon A, Landolfi K, Shanks CB, Hansen L, Iverson L, and Anacker M. 2016. Food Insecurity Experience: Building Empathy in Future Food and Nutrition Professionals. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2016.10.023 Harris JK, Hawkins JB, Nguyen L, Nsoesie EO, Tuli G, Mansour R, and Brownstein JS. 2017. Using Twitter to Identify and Respond to Food Poisoning: The Food Safety STL Project. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. doi: 10.1097/phh.0000000000000516 Harrison JA, Critzer FJ, and Harrison MA. 2016. Regulatory and food safety knowledge gaps associated with small and very small food businesses as identified by regulators and food safety educators - implications for food safety training. Food Protection Trends 36(6):420-7. http://www.foodprotection.org/files/food-protection-trends/nov-dec-16-harrison.pdf Hilverda F, Kuttschreuter M, and Giebels E. 2017. Social media mediated interaction with peers, experts and anonymous authors: conversation partner and message framing effects on risk perception and sense-making of organic food. Food Quality and Preference 56(Part A):107-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.09.003 Instinctif Partners L. 2016. EFSA's food and feed crisis preparedness training: 2015 Crisis Training Exercise. EFSA Supporting Publications 13(1):EN-987. doi: 10.2903/sp.efsa.2016.EN-987 Kalle R, and Soukand R. 2016. Current and remembered past uses of wild food plants in Saaremaa, Estonia: changes in the context of unlearning debt. Economic Botany 70(3):235-53. doi: 10.1007/s12231-016-9355-x Kararo MJ, Orvis KS, and Knobloch NA. 2016. Eat Your Way to Better Health: evaluating a garden-based nutrition program for youth. HortTechnology 26(5):663-8. doi: 10.21273/horttech03225-16 Kendall P, Scharff R, Baker S, LeJeune J, Sofos J, and Medeiros L. 2017. Food Safety Instruction Improves Knowledge and Behavior Risk and Protection Factors for Foodborne Illnesses in Pregnant Populations. Maternal and Child Health Journal. doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2291-2 Lai Y-H. 2016. The Effect of Computer-Assisted Instruction for Elementary School Students in Food Safety and Sanitation Knowledge. In: Park CJ and Khan MR (Editors). 2016 3rd International Conference on Chemical and Food Engineering, Vol. 62. doi: 10.1051/matecconf/20166202001 Lavarack B, and Stuart P. 2016. Implementation and review of the SOTrain training package at Mackay sugar. Proceedings of the 38th Conference of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, Mackay, Queensland, Australia, 27–29 April 2016, 03-M 03. Available from: https://www.assct.com.au/media//pdfs/members/M%2003%20Lavarack%20and%20Stuart.pdf Lee J. 2016. Development of a Korean food culture education textbook for married female immigrants. Korean Journal of Community Nutrition 21(5):415-25. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2016.21.5.415 Luchansky JB, Porto-Fett ACS, and Chapman B. 2017. A shopper's eye view of food safety at retail stores: lessons from photographs taken while grocery shopping. Food Protection Trends 37(1):30-42. Maeda N and Dote S. 2016. Construction of hygienic control system of a training room for food services: precaution and prevention of secondary contamination: hygienic control and educational techniques of facilities, instruments and equipment. Bokin Bobai - Journal of Antibacterial and Antifungal Agents 44(12):661-9. Magalhaes Bosi ML, and Teixeira MJ. 2016. Binge eating under a complex reading: Subsidies for the praxis of food and nutrition education. Revista De Nutricao-Brazilian Journal of Nutrition 29(6):899-915. doi: 10.1590/1678-98652016000600013 Majowicz SE, Hammond D, Dubin JA, Diplock KJ, Jones-Bitton A, Rebellato S, and Leatherdale ST. 2017. A longitudinal evaluation of food safety knowledge and attitudes among Ontario high school students following a food handler training program. Food Control 76:108-16. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.01.011 Malmborg J, Bremander A, Olsson MC, and Bergman S. 2017. Health status, physical activity, and orthorexia nervosa: a comparison between exercise science students and business students. Appetite, 109:137-143. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.11.028 Meek F. 2016. The Food Teacher Professional Portfolio - a personal and professional development programme for secondary food teachers. Nutrition Bulletin 41(4):365-71. doi: 10.1111/nbu.12239 Micali FG and Diez-Garcia RW. 2016. Pictorial instrument of food and nutrition education for promoting healthy eating. Revista De Nutricao-Brazilian Journal of Nutrition 29(6):917-28. doi: 10.1590/1678-98652016000600014 Minarik P, Minarikova D, Szucs G, and Golian J. 2016. Public awareness of food and other lifestyle-related factors towards cancer development among adults in Slovakia: a pilot study. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research 55(4):342-51. Minkiewicz P, Darewicz M, Iwaniak A, Bucholska J, Starowicz P, and Czyrko E. 2016. Internet databases of the properties, enzymatic reactions, and metabolism of small molecules - search options and applications in food science. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 17(12):2039. doi: 10.3390/ijms17122039 Nakagomi E, Sudo N, and Tsuboyama-Kasaoka N. 2016. Educational effectiveness of a DVD about nutrition assistance in disasters among university students in registered dietitian training courses. Japanese Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics 74(6):191-201. doi: 10.5264/eiyogakuzashi.74.191 Nan X, Verrill L, and Kim J. 2017. Mapping Sources of Food Safety Information for US Consumers: Findings From a National Survey. Health Communication 32(3):356-65. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1138385 Nicolescu CL, Buruleanu CL, and Gorghiu G. 2016. “Microbes in the Refrigerator” - Investigation Based Learning: A New Approach to Teach Food Hygiene. New Approaches in Social and Humanistic Sciences 353–9. Ovca A, Jevsnik M, and Raspor P. 2017. Future professional food handlers' perspectives towards food safety. British Food Journal 119(2):411-24. doi: 10.1108/bfj-07-2016-0335 Park S, Cho M, Yoo M, Kim S, Im E, Song J, Jun I. 2016. Horticultural activity program for improving emotional intelligence, prosocial behavior, and scientific investigation abilities and attitudes in kindergarteners. HortTechnology 26(6):754-61. doi: 10.21273/horttech03489-16 Park S, Lee H, Seo D, Oh K, Hwang T, and Choi B. 2016. Educating restaurant owners and cooks to lower their own sodium intake is a potential strategy for reducing the sodium contents of restaurant foods: a small-scale pilot study in South Korea. Nutrition Research and Practice 10(6):635-40. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2016.10.6.635 Pellitteri K, Huberty J, Ehlers D, and Bruening M. 2017. Fit minded college edition pilot study: can a magazine-based discussion group improve physical activity in female college freshmen? Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 23(1):e10-9. doi: 10.1097/phh.0000000000000257 Pliakoni ED, Shoemaker CA, Janke R, and Rivard CL. 2016. Building a new graduate program as a model for collaboration between institutions and industry. In: McConchie R, Jones B, Stanley J, Batt P, and Drew R (Editors). Acta Horticulturae (pp. 187–92). doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1126.24 Polak R, Dacey M, and Phillips EM. 2017. Time for food - training physiatrists in nutritional prescription. Journal of rehabilitation medicine 49(2):106-12. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2178 Preethi P, Apurba C, and Dworkin MS. 2017. Food safety knowledge and behaviors among African Americans of predominantly low socioeconomic status. Food Protection Trends 37(1):16-24. Reboucas LT, Santiago LB, Martins LS, Rios Menezes AC, Nazare Araujo MdP, and de Castro Almeida RC. 2017. Food safety knowledge and practices of food handlers, head chefs and managers in hotels' restaurants. of Salvador, Brazil. Food Control 73:372-81. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.08.026 Recine E, Santos Porto EB, Fernandez PM, and Pereira MR. 2016. Analysis of nutrition (and food) education syllabus of nutrition undergraduate courses. Revista De Nutricao-Brazilian Journal of Nutrition 29(6):885-97. doi: 10.1590/1678-98652016000600012 Reddy K, Kearns M, Arango SA, Martin IC, Cuervo-Pardo N, Cuervo-Pardo L, Gonzalez-Estrada A. 2016. YouTube and Food Allergy: An Appraisal of the Educational Quality of Information. Annals of Allergy Asthma and Immunology 117(5):S103-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2016.09.288 Reed DW, Arnold MA, Lineberger RD, and Davis TD. 2016. Challenges of higher education in the US - what will horticulture of the future look like? In: McConchie R, Jones B, Stanley J, Batt P, and Drew R (Editors). Acta Horticulturae. pp. 205–17. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1126.27 Richards R, Brown LB, Williams DP, and Eggett DL. 2017. Developing a Questionnaire to Evaluate College Students' Knowledge, Attitude, Behavior, Self-efficacy, and Environmental Factors Related to Canned Foods. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 49(2):117-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2016.10.004 Ringland EM, Gifford JA, Denyer GS, Thai D, Franklin JL, Stevenson MM, O'Connor HT. 2016. Evaluation of an electronic tool to assess food label literacy in adult Australians: A pilot study. Nutrition and Dietetics 73(5):482-9. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12271 Rivard CL, Fusselman MJ, Bates MA, and Nixon KM. 2016. The growing growers farmer education program. In: McConchie R, Jones B, Stanley J, Batt P, and Drew R (Editors). Acta Horticulturae. pp. 219–25. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1126.28 Ronto R, Ball L, Pendergast D, and Harris N. 2016. Adolescents' perspectives on food literacy and its impact on their dietary behaviours. Appetite 107:549-57. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.09.006 Ronto R, Ball L, Pendergast D, and Harris N. 2017. What is the status of food literacy in Australian high schools? Perceptions of home economics teachers. Appetite 108:326-34. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.10.024 Rossi MdSC, Stedefeldt E, Cunha DTd, and Rosso VVd. 2017. Food safety knowledge, optimistic bias and risk perception among food handlers in institutional food services. Food Control 73(Part B):681-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.09.016 Salazar Vazquez BY, Salazar Vazquez MA, Lopez Gutierrez G, Acosta Rosales K, Cabrales P, Vadillo-Ortega F, Schmid-Schonbein GW. 2016. Control of overweight and obesity in childhood through education in meal time habits. The ‘good manners for a healthy future’ programme. Pediatric Obesity 11(6):484-90. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12091 Schott W and Cachelin A. 2017. Promotion vs. education in choosing “Real The Journal of Development doi: H, R, and 2016. in Education of Knowledge Integration into of Food Quality and In: and (Editors). Proceedings of 2016 International Conference on Social Education and Research doi: S, S, and 2017. and a food to a Journal of Nutrition doi: EM, A, D, D, and Chapman B. 2016. of risk about by restaurant Journal of Food Protection doi: and 2017. Our and Our of doi: L, M, A, and 2016. of US school for students. Journal of School Health doi: CL, and G. 2017. of Food Safety in the and Journal of Food Science doi: JA, and 2017. food skills of university students. Appetite doi: JA, S, SN, and 2017. on to and public for education in the United a study. Appetite doi: Worsley A, H, S, and P. 2016. school and home economics education food Health Promotion International doi: N, Verrill L, and Kim J. 2017. Mapping of Food Safety Information for from a National Survey. Health Communication 32(3):356-65. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1138385 A, S, SE, and 2017. Study of an educational intervention for reducing in in Journal of Food Protection doi: S, X, and L. 2016. Research on the of in the of safety & Food M. 2016. food education and a food in doi: and Lee S. 2016. and evaluation of food questionnaire for Korean Korean Journal of Community Nutrition H, J, and 2016. The Studies of Engineering in the of Food In: 2016 International Conference on Communication and Social Sciences 2016. Practice of and on and of Food Science in In: and (Editors). Proceedings of 2016 International Conference on Social Education and Research

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,481
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,995

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,001
Communication savante0,0010,005
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,110
Tête enseignante GPT0,466
Écart entre enseignants0,356 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle