245 An Investigation of Pain Responses Among Burn Injured Children
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The purpose of this study is to investigate whether children who were burned in infancy experience greater pain after a medical procedure than those burned later in childhood. According to research carried out by Wollgarten-Hadamek et al. (2009; 2011), children who have received treatment for a severe burn injury in infancy may have altered pain responses in later childhood. Thus, our group is specifically interested in determining if these findings are valid among burn patients treated at our pediatric burn center. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at our institution. Children admitted between 2014 and 2018 were divided into two groups: 1) burn sustained during infancy (< 2 years) and 2) burn sustained during post-infancy (> 2–18 years). Pain scores following laser treatment of the resulting burn scar were compared between the two groups. The pain management model for acute burn care at our institution includes using a closed dressing technique coupled with sedation/anesthesia for dressing changes +/- the use of narcotics followed by acetaminophen and ibuprofen. Contributing factors examined in the analysis included site of injury (critical areas: face, hands, feet, perineum, major joints) and total body surface area (TBSA) of the original burn. Patients without pain scores or those that had laser therapy combined with another medical procedure were excluded. Ninety-nine patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at injury and TBSA was 1.1 years (SD, 0.66) and 10.7% (SD, 9.01) in the younger group and 7.9 years (SD, 4.1) and 10.9% (SD, 9.74) in the older group. The incidence of pain in the younger and older groups was 28.6% (95% CI, 0.15–0.42) and 28.0% (95% CI, 0.16–0.40) respectively. There was no significant difference in the odds of reporting pain between the two age groups with respect to: 1) site of injury (OR=0.57 (95% CI, 0.12- 2.68) versus OR=1.02 (95% CI, 0.30–3.47)) and 2) burn size (OR=0.85 (95% CI, 0.21–3.4) versus OR=0.38, (95% CI, 0.11–1.27)). In this retrospective cohort study, children burned in infancy did not experience increased pain compared to children burned later in life. Although larger-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings, the results of this study further our understanding of pain responses following a burn injury. The findings obtained from this study contribute to the limited body of literature regarding pain in pediatric burn patients and suggest that early age at injury may not lead to hyperalgesia later in life. Ultimately, the results of this study and future subsequent studies could be used to help design an optimal pain management protocol for burn-injured children.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».