A118 FECAL CALPROTECTIN COMPLETION RATES AMONG PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Fecal Calprotectin (FC) is a biomarker that has been shown to be sensitive and specific for mucosal inflammation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). FC is useful to monitor disease activity and response to therapy in patients with IBD. Unfortunately, several factors contribute to a fairly low return rate of FC tests. The current study aimed to determine the return rate of FC tests for patients with IBD in a clinical care setting and to assess whether there were any factors associated with a successful completion of the test. We conducted a retrospective review of IBD patients at the Pacific Gastroenterology Associates, a tertiary, outpatient care center in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. All patients who were enrolled in a patient support program for the purposes of administering biologic drug treatment for their IBD and who were requested to have FC testing performed between January 2017 and September 2018 were included. Enrolled patient records were reviewed for demographic data, disease characteristics, current biologic medication, FC completion, and FC results. Univariate regression was used to identify factors potentially associated with successful completion of the test and multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the independence of those variables. A total of 426 patients were included in the study, 60% were female, and 82% had Crohn’s disease (CD). We observed a completion rate of 87% (n=374) of FC testing kits provided through patient support program. The median time to complete the test was four weeks (IQR 2.0–6.0). Overall, 37% (n=159) patients who completed the test had a positive FC value (>250 μg/g). Patients with CD were twice as likely to complete the test as patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) (OR 2.07 [1.07–3.98] p = 0.03). The disease location did not impact the likelihood of completing the test, but on multivariate analysis, CD patients without perianal disease had higher completion rates than those with perianal disease (OR 2.79 [1.26–6.20] p = 0.012). Interestingly, patients of a physician who specializes in IBD during pregnancy, had a lower completion rate, than those belonging to physicians who do not specialize in IBD in pregnancy. (OR 2.19 [0.86–5.54] p 0.098 and OR 2.92 [1.53–5.56] p 0.001). We observed a higher completion rate (87%) of FC testing kit than prior studies. This may be due to the fact that the patient support programs have a coordinator who facilitates completion of the test. While no demographic characteristics were associated with completion of the FC test, CD, especially without perianal involvement, had a higher completion rate than UC. Further study is required to clarify factors that may be associated with successful completion of FC testing in order to improve patient adherence and increase the utility of FC testing for patients with IBD. None
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».