Factors that contribute to the process of reporting concussion symptoms experienced by Canadian Football League players
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Concussions continue to be at the forefront of research today and are still an ongoing problem for athletes across sporting domains. Further investigation is warranted to achieve a greater understanding of concussions. Purpose: The purpose of this dissertation was to explore research related to sports-related concussions, how concussions affect athletes and those surrounding the athletes at all levels of sport, with a particular focus on Canadian Football League players and the underreporting of concussions. This dissertation also reviews qualitative research methodologies, and how they are applied within concussion research. Research Questions: a) What is my own personal relationship with concussions? In particular, what was my experience with the culture of the CFL while I was playing professional football, and later, during my transition out of professional football? b) What is the extent, range, and nature of the peer-reviewed qualitative research literature on concussions in sport? c) What factors contribute to the process of reporting concussion symptoms in Canadian Football League players? Methodology: I utilized an autoethnography to for the first question, a scoping review to address the second question, and a constructivist grounded theory study (in a sample of ten current and retired CFL players) to approach the third question. Findings: Within the autoethnography presented herein, several factors were identified as influencing the way I interpreted my experiences throughout my playing career, and my subsequent transition from professional sport. The scoping review of qualitative research in sport-related concussion suggested that qualitative research is useful for exploring all levels and types of sports. It further suggested that qualitative methodologies provide researchers with a lens that can be used to view the athletes going through the concussions, and also the other people in their lives such as physicians, parents, coaches, care-takers, teammates and equipment personnel. Different methodologies highlighted several different areas such as barriers to reporting concussions, lived experiences, media portrayal of concussions, coping strategies and effected relationships. Finally, the empirical data collected within the grounded theory study that formed the primary study within this dissertation suggested several factors that influenced the underreporting of concussions in the CFL, within three contexts: a) premeditated thoughts during the pre-game b) assessing the hit on the field and c) during the recovery process of a concussion. Implications: Findings show the current state of concussion research and highlights several factors that influence professionals to underreport their concussions. Implications for future research are discussed.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,010 | 0,046 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,009 | 0,008 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».