A280 ASSESSING THE ROLE OF A RIGHT HEMICOLECTOMY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF APPENDICEAL NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOURS AT A TERTIARY-CARE CENTRE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
While it is clear that neuroendocrine tumours of the appendix (NET-A) <1 cm can be treated with a simple appendectomy alone, management of NET-A between 1- to 2 cm and > 2cm remains controversial. Current guidelines suggest that a right hemicolectomy (RHC) is recommended for tumours >2 cm and for tumours 1- to 2 cm with high risk features such as deep mesoappendiceal invasion (MAI), high Ki67 and/or high mitotic rate. The rates of lymph node (LN) metastasis in patients who had RHC for tumours >2 cm is variable in literature, ranging from 0–50%. Even in the cases of LN invasion, there is still unclear evidence to show that RHC improves overall survival or that it is clinically justified. Since there are no standardized adjuvant treatments for NET-A, the LN status would not further inform additional therapy, thus questioning its role in practice. Given the indolent nature of these tumours, the notion of over-treatment with RHC in patients with NET-A between 1- to 2 cm and >2 cm arises. Theobjective of this study is to assess the role of RHC in the management of NET-A. This was achieved by determining the nodal positivity rate based on size and by examining the relationship between the surgical approach used, various prognostic factors (tumour location, MAI, LN invasion, etc.), post-operative complication rates, and survival outcomes. An 8-year retrospective study was performed on patients with a pathological diagnosis of NET-A. Patients were excluded if they had a diagnosis of a non-appendiceal neuroendocrine tumour or an appendiceal non-neuroendocrine tumour. Forty-nine patients were identified with a diagnosis of a NET-A (mean age 40.4, 95% CI 36.3–44.5). Twenty-seven tumours (55%) were <1cm, eighteen (37%) were 1-2cm, and four (8%) were >2cm. Five patients with tumours <1cm had RHC (19%), while seven had one with tumours 1-2cm (39%). All four patients with tumours >2cm had RHC. Of the tumours <1cm, none were node-positive, while 11% of tumours 1-2cm were node-positive. All tumours >2cm had node-positive disease. The overall complication rate for patients who were treated with RHC was 31%. Based on the Clavien-Dindo classification, there were two grade I, one grade II, and two grade III complications. There was no recurrence of disease and there were no deaths due to NET-A across all patients. The use of a right hemicolectomy is shown to be unnecessary for tumours <1cm. In tumours >2cm, all patients had nodal disease – while it may not affect overall survival, its use may be justified to reduce the risk of local disease recurrence. A minority of patients had positive nodal disease in the 1-2cm group. In these cases, the risks of surgery vs. observation should be balanced to prevent the risk of over-treatment, especially with the lack of evidence for the benefit to overall survival. None
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».