A96 ADALIMUMAB FOR MAINTENANCE OF REMISSION IN CROHN’S DISEASE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Maintenance of remission of Crohn’s disease (CD) is a clinically important goal, as disease relapse can negatively affect quality of life. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy and safety of adalimumab for maintenance of remission in patients with quiescent CD. EMBASE, MEDLINE, CENTRAL and the Cochrane IBD Group Specialized Register were searched from inception to April 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing adalimumab to placebo or an active comparator were considered for inclusion. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. Risk ratios (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. The primary outcome was the number of patients who relapsed. Secondary outcomes were failure to maintain clinical response, endoscopic remission, endoscopic response, histological remission and adverse events. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. GRADE was used to assess the overall quality of evidence supporting the primary outcome. Seven RCTs (n=1229) were included. Five trials were rated low risk of bias and two trials were rated as unclear risk of bias. Three studies comprising 683 patients included relapse at 52–56 weeks as an endpoint. Fifty-nine percent (252/430) of patients treated with adalimumab relapsed compared with 86% (217/253) of patients receiving placebo (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.63–0.76, P<0.05; moderate quality evidence). Two RCTs (302 patients) reported the number of patients who failed to maintain clinical or endoscopic relapse at 52–56 weeks among those who received prior TNF antagonist therapy. Sixty-nine percent (129/186) of adalimumab patients relapsed compared with 93% (108/116) receiving placebo (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.68–0.84, P<0.05; high quality evidence). Two RCTs including 562 patients included relapse at 24–26 weeks as an endpoint. Fifty-one percent (192/374) of patients who received adalimumab relapsed compared with 75% (149/188) of those who received placebo (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.49–0.81, P<0.05; low quality evidence). Serious adverse events were seen in 8% (52/643) of patients who received adalimumab and 14% (53/368) of patients who received placebo (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.38–0.79, P<0.05; low quality evidence) and withdrawal due to adverse events was reported in 7% (45/643) of adalimumab patients compared to 13% (48/369) of placebo patients (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39–0.83, P<0.05; low quality evidence) between the adalimumab and placebo groups. Adalimumab is an effective therapy to maintain clinical remission in patients with CD. It is also effective in patients who have previously been treated with TNF antagonists. Future research should continue to explore factors that influence initial and subsequent biologic selection for patients with moderate to severe CD. None
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,022 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,008 | 0,009 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».