MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2922383959 · doi:10.1055/s-0039-1679643

Benefit of Endoscopic Surgery in the Management of Acute Invasive Skull Base Fungal Rhinosinusitis: Clinical Morbidity and Outcome in a 20-Year Period

2019· article· en· W2922383959 sur OpenAlexaff
Megan R. D’Andrea, Corey M. Gill, Satish Govindaraj, Anthony G. Del Signore, Raj Shrivastava, Alfred Marc Iloreta

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull Base · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSinusitis and nasal conditions
Établissements canadiensMount Sinai Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineDebridement (dental)SurgeryChronic rhinosinusitisSkullEndoscopic sinus surgeryDiseaseEndoscopySinus (botany)Internal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Acute fungal rhinosinusitis, often seen among immunocompromised patients, is a rapidly progressive, life-threatening condition associated with poor prognosis. Surgical debridement can be challenging when infection is associated with skull base extension. Recent studies have shown that aggressive endoscopic sinus surgery can be effective in removing invasive disease. We reviewed clinical characteristics of patients who underwent endoscopic surgical debridement of acute fungal rhinosinusitis to evaluate postoperative outcomes and risk for recurrence. We present a series of 14 patients with clinically and histopathologically confirmed skull base fungal rhinosinusitis who underwent pure endoscopic surgery. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with skull base fungal rhinosinusitis treated with an endoscopic surgical approach at our institution from 1998 to 2018. Demographic and clinical data including age, sex, underlying comorbidities, presenting symptoms, physical exam findings, radiologic findings, preoperative course, operative procedure, postoperative complications, number of debridements, histologic and microbiologic findings, length of stay, and postoperative course were reviewed. Results: Fourteen patients underwent endoscopic removal of fungal sinusitis. Five patients (35.7%) were women and nine (64.3%) were men. Median age at the time of primary surgery was 66.1 years (range, 24.9–84.5). The most common underlying medical comorbidities were hematologic malignancy in nine (65.3%) patients and poorly controlled diabetes in seven (50%) patients. Mean HbA1c for diabetic patients was 7.7%. Presenting symptoms included headache (50%), eye pain (42.9%), facial pain (28.6%), visual changes (21.4%), and congestion (14.3%). One patient presented with left-side proptosis and a left cranial nerve six palsy. In another patient, fungal sinusitis was identified incidentally during MR stroke evaluation. Radiologic findings included hyperdensity of multiple sinuses (28.6%) and skull base erosion (21.4%). The most common fungi were Mucormycosis (42.9%) and Aspergillus (35.7%). Fungal cultures were obtained in all patients; nine (64.3%) demonstrated positive growth after 28 days of incubation. 71.4% of patients received preoperative antibiotics, 28.6% received preoperative antifungals, and 28.6% received preoperative steroids. Postoperatively, 98.9% of patients received antibiotics, 100% received antifungals, and 42.9% received steroids. Twelve (85.7%) patients underwent a purely endoscopic surgical approach, and two (14.3%) patients had a combined endoscopic and open approach. 11 (79.6%) patients had invasive disease, three (21.4%) had noninvasive disease. Eight (57.1%) patients subsequently developed recurrence and required multiple surgical debridements. The mean number of debridements was 1.5. Median time to second surgery was 11 days. Six (42.9%) patients died during their postoperative recovery. One mortality was due to massive epistaxis leading to hypovolemic shock. The remaining eight (57.1%) patients were discharged postsurgery. Median time to discharge was 23 days. Conclusion: Acute fungal rhinosinusitis is a rare complication of immunocompromised patients. Surgical intervention is an option for definitive management; however, postoperative mortality and risk of recurrence requiring additional surgical interventions remains high. Patients with diabetes had a better prognosis than those with a hematological malignancy. Due to the long delay of obtaining positive fungal cultures and pathology, we advocate early aggressive multimodal treatment. Multiple debridements may be necessary in most cases and close surveillance is needed during treatment.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,003

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,078
Tête enseignante GPT0,322
Écart entre enseignants0,244 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull BaseMême sujetSinusitis and nasal conditionsTravaux en français237 207