MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2923967387 · doi:10.2118/0419-0018-jpt

E&P Notes (April 2019)

2019· article· en· W2923967387 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Trent Jacobs, Matt Zborowski, Stephen Whitfield, Stephen Rassenfoss

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueOil and Gas Production Techniques
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSubmarine pipelineGeologyCorporationOil shalePetroleum engineeringBusinessOperations researchEngineeringOceanographyFinancePaleontology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

E&P Notes CNOOC’s “Major Find” In North Sea Is Biggest In 11 Years Trent Jacobs, JPT Digital Editor The Chinese National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC) discovered a gas and condensate reservoir at the state-owned company’s Glengorm prospect in the UK North Sea. The resource, located 118 miles east of Aberdeen, is estimated to hold close to 250 million bbl BOE. CNOOC tapped the reservoir in a water depth of 282 ft with a jackup rig. Total depth of the exploration well was just over 16,500 ft and gas and condensate pay zones were found with a thickness of 123 ft. The company had previously tried and failed to drill two prospect wells in 2017. Xie Yuhong, executive vice president of CNOOC, said the “Glengorm discovery demonstrates the great exploration potential” for the offshore block and that the company is “looking forward to further appraisal.” CNOOC is the operator of the field with a 50% interest. French supermajor Total owns a 25% stake in the field and Euroil holds the remaining 25%. Chesapeake Teams with Analytics Firm to Improve Asset Performance Matt Zborowski, Technology Writer Chesapeake Energy is partnering with RS Energy Group to improve operational efficiency and capital discipline by employing advanced analytics and machine learning. RS Energy is a Calgary-based energy research firm founded in 1998 covering more than 150 operators in the major North American and international oil and gas regions, including the US shale plays. It provides technical analysis of basins, including completions and production, as well as asset evaluations for operators considering acreage additions. All of this is done within the context of shifting capital markets. Chesapeake announced the pact fresh off its $4-billion merger with WildHorse Resource Development, which bolstered its position in the Eagle Ford Shale of South Texas. The Oklahoma City-based independent has overhauled its portfolio in recent years and now is focused on just a few major US basins, increasing its companywide share of oil production, and reducing debt. Noble Energy Touts Output Gains, Potential from “Row Development” Concept Matt Zborowski, Technology Writer “Row development” is in full swing on Noble Energy’s operated acreage in Colorado’s DJ Basin, and now the company is beginning to apply the approach to its Delaware Basin acreage in West Texas. The first completed row in Noble’s 75,000-acre Mustang project in the DJ Basin produced 26,000 BOE/D, of which 60% was oil, during fourth quarter 2018, the independent reported in its year-end earnings call. The row consists of 31 wells. “We expect that momentum to continue into 2019,” said Brent Smolik, Noble president and chief operating officer. Bolstered in part by row development, the firm’s overall DJ oil and gas output increased 10% during the quarter and 15% for the year. EIA Adds New Plays to Shale Gas, Tight Oil Reports Stephen Whitfield, Senior Staff Writer The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) has added new play production data to its shale gas and tight oil reports. Last December, US shale and tight plays produced approximately 65 Bcf/D of natural gas and 7 million B/D of crude oil, accounting for 70% and 60% of US production in those areas, respectively. These totals represent a significant jump in the last 10 years: shale gas and tight oil accounted for 16% of total US gas production and approximately 12% of US total crude oil production, according to EIA statistics. EIA updated its production volume estimates to include seven additional shale gas and tight oil plays, increasing the share of shale gas by 9% and tight oil by 8% compared with previously estimated shale production volumes. The change captures increasing production from new, emerging plays as well as from older plays that had previously been in decline, but are now rebounding because of advancements in horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing. Devon Pulls Up Its Roots, Goes All In on US Oil Stephen Rassenfoss, JPT Emerging Technology Senior Editor Devon Energy will be shedding its holdings in the Barnett and the Canadian oil sands as part of a program to shrink the company to focus on four US unconventional oil plays. The program announced along with earnings is the last step in a series of asset sales to create a “New Devon,” which also promises to reduce annual costs by $780 million by 2021, with most of that done by the end of this year. The “sustainable cost reductions” will target expenses in field operations, drilling, and completions. It did not specifically mention job reductions, but the list of cost-saving steps includes “better aligning personnel with the go-forward business.” Brazil’s Lula Field a Step Closer to Producing 1 Million B/D Petrobras, alongside partners Shell and Galp, has launched production from the seventh Lula field floating production, storage, and offloading (FPSO) vessel, bringing the consortium a step closer to reaching 1 million B/D of oil from the prolific Lula hub offshore Brazil. Hydrocarbons are flowing to the P-67 FPSO as part of the Lula North deepwater project in the pre-salt Santos Basin. The vessel, which has a capacity of 150,000 B/D of oil and 6 million cu m/day of natural gas, sits in 2130 m of water on the BM-S-11 concession 260 km off Rio de Janeiro state. P-67 will be connected to nine production wells and multiple injection wells. Oil will be offloaded to lifting vessels and gas will be sent through pre-salt gas pipelines.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,412
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,400

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,215
Écart entre enseignants0,209 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Petroleum TechnologyMême sujetOil and Gas Production TechniquesTravaux en français237 207