Imagining Law: Curated Narratives of Sexual Assault in The Ghomeshi Effect
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This project explores how myths of law are aesthetically animated.I unpack narratives of sexual violence, trauma, and social transformation presented in the verbatim theatre performance of The Ghomeshi Effect.I suggest that while the producers of the play claim that the verbatim methods authentically tell experiences of sexual violence, their representation of these narratives reproduce broader myths of law as an ordered system of truth.Stories of sexual violence in this performance are not authentic representations, but an aesthetic platform through which the power of law is animated.often not heard by medical and legal models in meaningful ways.Alternatively, peer support work, lead by community volunteers who are extensively trained in knowledge about the intersections of gendered and institutionalized violence are the basis of the Centre's outreach framework.Rather than a complaint or reporting process, rape crisis centres often focus on providing confidential spaces, like crisis lines, one-on-one support sessions, or peer-support focus groups.These centres work within principles of belief and active listening.4 During my training, the lessons consistently iterated that, unlike medical and legal models of reporting, rape crisis centres that focus on feminist, intersectional, and peer-support programming provide spaces for victims to authentically represent their own stories of violence and trauma.5 Peer support methods are seen to provide more meaningful support than law or medicine because of their perceived ability to authentically represent victims of sexual violence.Rape crisis centres that work with this model hold the perception that law often distorts experiences of sexual violence by placing them inside institutional influences that are considered to prioritize white-male experiences.Peer support models pose a contrast between rape crisis centres and law, specifically in their abilities to provide an authentic representation of sexual assault victim experiences, claiming that these centres can be a space outside of institutional biases.The timing of my peer-support training overlapped with the high-profile case of Jian Ghomeshi, a Canadian radio personality who was accused of sexually assaulting several women he had worked with at the CBC.Naturally, he was the topic of discussion 4 The principles of belief and active listening mean that when a service user comes to a centre or calls a crisis line, their stories and experiences with violence are to be acknowledged as truth and never judged.This is a main reason how rape crisis centres distance themselves from legal or medical models, noting that the centres do not take reports or spearhead investigations; they are meant to provide support and trauma counselling.5 Information gathered here about support work was gained during my peer support training sessions in Spring of 2016.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,015 | 0,031 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».