Older audiences in the digital media environment: A cross-national longitudinal study. Wave 2 Report v1.0
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Ageing + Communication + Technologies (ACT) cross-national longitudinal study explores processes of displacement of traditional dominant media by innovative communication practices within the older audience of new media. Replicating Nimrod’s (2017) study of older audiences, data is collected on a biannual basis. The first wave of data collection was based on surveys with Internet users aged 60 and up and took place in November 2016. Quotas were instituted to ensure that each sample is representative of the country’s older online population. With varying expected dropout rates, the original samples were planned to have a final panel that will comprise about 500 participants per country. For this reason, sample sizes in the first wave were not equal and ranged between 715 (Denmark) and 3,538 (Canada). The overall sample size consisted of 10,527 Internet users aged 60 and over. For a full report of the first wave please see Loos, Nimrod & Fernández-Ardèvol (2018). The present report relates to the second wave of data collection, which was held in November 2018. In this second wave, we returned to participants from six countries that took part in the first wave (Austria, Canada, Israel, Netherlands, Romania, and Spain). In addition, we interviewed older Internet users from Finland—a country that was not included in the first wave. Unfortunately, Denmark, which was included in the first wave, was not part of the second wave. Data were collected by the same commercial firms that collected the data in the first wave. With the exception of Romania, where the survey was conducted via telephone due to a low rate of Internet users among the older population, all firms applied an online survey. In the second wave, we tried to contact all the participants from the first wave. Study participants were reached out by the firms and were sent several reminders during the data collection period. Overall, 8,447 people who participated in the first survey were contacted. Repeated response rates ranged between 61% and 86% with the highest in the Netherlands. The total number of repeated participants included in the final dataset was 6,225. In addition, Spain recruited 172 new participants and Finland added 1,520 participants, leading to an overall sample size of 7,940 Internet users aged 62 and over in the second wave.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle