366 MISUSE OF CHILD RESTRAINT SEATS IN MANITOBA: RESULTS OF A 2004 SURVEY.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction Child passenger restraints, including rear-facing infant seats, forward-facing toddler seats, and booster seats, provide protection for pediatric passengers traveling in motor vehicles. Objective To investigate the use and misuse rate of child restraint seats in Manitoba. Methods Characteristics of child restraint seat use were assessed at 10 child safety seat inspection surveys held between May 2004 and August 2004 in Manitoba. The sample of convenience included (1) rear-facing infant seat: for infants until they are at least 20 pounds and 1 year old (n = 49); (2) forward-facing toddler seat: for toddlers 20 to 40 pounds and 1 to 4 years old (n = 175); and (3) booster seats: for children 40 to 80 pounds and 4 to 8 years old (n = 118). In all, MCSC child safety seats specialists inspected a total of 342 child restraint seats. Results The overall rate of misuse was 63%, with 73% of infant carriers used inappropriately. The most common type of misuse found in infant carriers was loosely fitted seats (91%) followed by chest clips in the wrong position (86%). Seventy-four percent of forward-facing seats were incorrectly used. The most common type of misuse found in forward-facing child restraints was harness straps placed through the wrong slot (95%) followed by seats too loosely fitted (66%). Forty-three percent of booster seats were used incorrectly. The most common misuse found in booster seat was no head and neck protection offered (46%) followed by seat belts not crossing the child9s chest over the shoulder (37%). The risks of misuse of infant carriers compared with booster seats were nearly four times higher (odds ratio 3.63; confidence interval 1.75-7.55). The risks of misuse of forward-facing child restraint seats compared with booster seats were also nearly four times higher (odds ratio 3.68; confidence interval 2.24-6.04). Conclusions This paper is the first to describe child restraint seat misuse in Manitoba following the 1997 child restraint use survey conducted by Transport Canada. Infant carriers and forward-facing child restraint seats were much more likely to be misused than booster seats. This study also identified a statistically significant higher rate of infant carrier and forward-facing child restraint misuse compared with booster seat misuse in Manitoba. The Manitoba child restraint seat survey suggests that a large number of children still remain poorly protected when traveling in motor vehicles. The survey data presented here can be used to inform parents about the importance of correct child restraint use.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».