MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2930621534 · doi:10.1353/esc.2002.0073

Narrative in the Feminine: Daphne Marlatt and Nicole Brossard by Susan Knutson

2002· article· en· W2930621534 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Susan Holbrook

Notice bibliographique

RevueEnglish studies in Canada · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueTheatre and Performance Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoeticsNarrativeLiminalityMeaning (existential)NarratologyPoetrySociologyLiteratureArtArt historyAestheticsPhilosophyEpistemology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

REVIEWS materials gathered here provide guidance, factual information, and a range of critical analyses. Individually, or as a group, they illuminate Pollock’s work and contribute to an understanding of the place of theatre in our culture and history. SH ER R ILL E. G R A C E / U n iversity o f B ritish Colum bia Susan Knutson. Narrative in the Feminine: Daphne Marlatt and Nicole Brossard. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2002. 248. $59.95 cloth. Having taught and written on both Daphne Marlatt and Nicole Brossard, I was eager to review this new critical study of their works. I was particularly interested because the author of Nar­ rative in the Feminine is Susan Knutson, a writer whose anal­ yses of poetics I have often found instructive. Her 1995 char­ acterization of Brossard’s motive as “the drive to reach the internal horizons of meaning” (“Reading” 12) is one I return to, particularly as it accommodates a poetic committed to in­ terrogating and romancing the words we have inherited. The word “internal” acknowledges the impossibility of imagining a space wholly external to the symbolic, while “horizon,” a highly invested term in Brossard’s œuvre, signifies the liminal site of productive exploration and renovation. While Knutson and oth­ ers have fostered an interesting critical discussion about how Brossard and Marlatt negotiate a language sedimented with cultural bias, here we have an original study of the ways these poets approach the horizons of the larger grammar of narrative. Knutson brings classical narratology to bear on Marlatt’s long poem How Hug a Stone (1983) and Brossard’s novel Pic­ ture Theory (1982), a tack that leads her inevitably to a con­ comitant critique of this hermeneutic and the introduction of feminist narratology. Both authors are known for the way in which their creative projects blur with and serve as theoretical works, and here Knutson is able to draw from the primary texts themselves as they address traditional narratological assump­ tions. Marlatt, for example, challenges the notion of quest as universal narrative structure; while deploying this heroic model in her account of a trip to England with her son, she overtly 319 ESC 28, 2002 thematizes the failure of such a model to address adequately the intersubjective bond between parent and child and to move out of the gendered schema: male hero/female matrix. A narratological analysis of Knutson’s own book would note the reso­ nance (or to use the narratological term, “mirroring” ) between Marlatt’s simultaneous embrace and refusal of quest narrative and Knutson’s simultaneous adherence to and critique of narratology . Readers unfamiliar with the field of narratology will not be left behind in Knutson’s discussion. She very deftly introduces the key terms and methodologies of the discipline even as she promptly embarks on their application and interrogation. The strategy of committing to a theoretical approach while under­ mining it proves a tricky balancing act. For the most part, Knut­ son’s rigorous narratological analysis proves an excellent vehicle for the elucidation of the complex narrative structures of both Brossard and Marlatt. Since the narrative innovations of their texts ultimately throw into relief the flaws of traditional narra­ tology, however, there are moments when the reader might lose interest in the meticulous structuralist mapping that Knutson has undertaken here. I am grateful, for instance, that Knut­ son has articulated Brossard’s notion of the hologram more thoroughly than any critic to date, but that articulation in­ volves several tabulations of fabula (the chronological sequence of events, or deep structure) that read like statistics. Outside of some of these empirical moments, Narrative in the Feminine is a pleasure to read for its elegant style and intimate knowledge of feminist poetics. The text is bookended by introductory and concluding chap­ ters that address questions surrounding écriture au fém inin: W hat is it? And have these poets, indeed, written in the fem­ inine? Knutson rehearses feminist debates on the topic over several decades and situates specific dialogues and conflicts in France, America, Québec, and English Canada. She also demon­ strates the important contributions Marlatt and Brossard have made to these histories. The confluence of this body...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,513
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,525

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,232
Écart entre enseignants0,197 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2002
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEnglish studies in CanadaMême sujetTheatre and Performance StudiesTravaux en français237 207