MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2930960046 · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000004146

Nine Pints: A Journey Through the Money, Medicine, and Mysteries of Blood

2019· article· en· W2930960046 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Peter G. Brindley

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnesthesia & Analgesia · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueEmpathy and Medical Education
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineContext (archaeology)DutyTreasureLawHistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Despite a busy clinical life, I find time to read creative medical nonfiction, and I refuse to see this as an indulgence. Instead, it is an investment in empathy and a reminder of why the social context of medicine is important. If you can relate, then I suggest making haste to your local bookseller, library, or computer to pick up or download Rose George’s latest book, Nine Pints. Released in October 2018, the title reminds us of the approximate blood volume sloshing around in our bodies. The intriguing subheading, A Journey Through the Money, Medicine, andMysteries of Blood, presages a book about the traditions and symbolism of blood, plus cutting-edge science, political expose, engaging history, and the patient experience—including her own patient experience. In my (occasionally) humble opinion, and to paraphrase the book jacket, it is a “bloody good read.” Rose George’s paean to blood—the literal elixir of life—is no traditional medical text. This is clear from page 1. Its opening dedication is not to an august individual, but instead, it celebrates the UK National Health Service. Similarly, the opening quote is not the considered words of a bioscientist, but the poignant thanks of a pediatric patient: “Blood makes me feel better and once I’ve had blood I want to play with my toys again.” She does stalwart work by summarizing complex important topics such as the resurgence of whole blood donation, the allure of blood doping, the attraction of synthetic and cultured blood, and the diagnostic possibility of “liquid biopsy.” The science matters, but so does the politics of blood. As just one example, despite decades as a doctor, I finally understand the central fantastic paradox of donation, namely that a voluntary system is more reliable and safer than exchanging bucks for blood. Rose George is a popular science writer and journalist with a bachelor of arts from Oxford; not a health care professional. This is her fourth book and the most clinically relevant one. Like my doctoring job, her books are about comforting the afflicted and afflicting the comfortable and addressing the worthy but unheralded causes. George’s first book, A Life Removed: Hunting for Refuge in the Modern World (Penguin 2004), highlights those displaced by civil war. Her second book, The Big Necessity: The Unmentionable World of Human Waste (Metropolitan/Portobello 2008), argues that sanitation is the world’s most neglected public health issue. George’s peripatetic reporting reminds us that much of what matters happens away from the first-world gaze. This book proffers reports from Delhi and Nepal, South Africa, and indigenous Canada. This global perspective emphasizes that the seemingly ordinary act of donation is astonishing, and that discussions about blood are replete with contradictions. For example, leeches once built fortunes, then represented quackery, and have now returned to the bleeding edge. Blood can be life-saving, but it is a vector for death and a byword for tribalism. Blood is immensely valuable, but for centuries, it was drained by the bowlful. Her story of bloodletting also reminds us that dogma costs lives, and doctors can hurt while attempting to heal. George’s journalistic style means never shying away from her opinions and judgment. Readers of this Journal might prefer her to stick to objective facts and figures and to dedicate less space to menstruation and so-called “blood rejuvenation.” However, I believe that consternation and social justice concerns are justified, especially regarding the infected blood scandals of the 1980s, and because women are still shamed and banished during menses. Regardless, George gives equal time to blood villains, blood loonies, and blood heroes. Nine Pints is 351 pages of engaging popular science. It covers not only the pioneering scientists and volunteers who created the modern blood service, but also the social entrepreneurs who help stigmatized low-income women. George is also hagiographic about trauma teams and how they mix high tech and hard graft. She assists us doctors by informing the public that bleeding may be the “biggest disease people have never heard of.” She concludes by stating: “Blood is not done teaching us what it can do. More wonders will come.” For that, clinicians, researchers, and patients can all be grateful. Peter G. Brindley, MD, FRCPC, FRCP (Edin), FRCP (Lond)Department of Critical Care MedicineDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineDossetor Ethics CentreUniversity of AlbertaEdmonton, Canada[email protected]

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,016
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,053

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,009
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0120,012
Communication savante0,0150,016
Science ouverte0,0020,007
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,017
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0160,006

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,292
Écart entre enseignants0,270 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2019
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnesthesia & AnalgesiaMême sujetEmpathy and Medical EducationTravaux en français237 207