MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2934372634 · doi:10.1113/ep087447

Skeletal muscle mitochondrial bioenergetics in humans: Does sex matter?

2019· article· en· W2934372634 sur OpenAlexafffund
Lauren E. Skelly, Martin J. Gibala

Notice bibliographique

RevueExperimental Physiology · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueMuscle metabolism and nutrition
Établissements canadiensMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Mots-clésMitochondrial biogenesisCitrate synthaseSkeletal muscleEndurance trainingEndocrinologyMitochondrionInternal medicineBiologyBioenergeticsInterval trainingVO2 maxMedicineHeart rateCell biologyBiochemistry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Skeletal muscle displays remarkable plasticity, and a classical adaptation to exercise training is increased mitochondrial content. Acute exercise induces mitochondrial biogenesis through a complex series of events triggered by disturbances to cellular homeostasis, which activate multiple signalling cascades that converge on the transcriptional coactivator peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator 1α (PGC-1α) and lead to a coordinated increase in gene transcription. Mitochondrial content, typically measured using biomarkers such as the maximal activity of citrate synthase, increases over the course of successive exercise sessions owing to a cumulative net positive mitochondrial protein balance, whereby the overall rate of mitochondrial protein synthesis (MitoPS) exceeds breakdown. MitoPS can be measured using stable-isotope tracers, and oral administration of deuterium oxide (D2O) is a valuable tool that allows for integrative measures of protein synthesis to be made over a period of weeks to months in free-living conditions. Sprint interval training (SIT), involving brief, intermittent bursts of ‘all-out’ exercise interspersed with short recovery periods, is a potent stimulus to increase mitochondrial content, similar to traditional endurance training despite reduced exercise volume and time commitment. There is some evidence for sex-based differences in this training response, such that women may experience blunted rates of mitochondrial biogenesis compared with men. Scalzo et al. (2014) assessed MitoPS, based on oral administration of D2O, over 3 weeks of SIT in recreationally active men and women who were matched for baseline fitness. Analysis of skeletal muscle biopsy samples revealed that MitoPS tended to be higher in men compared with women after training. An ontological cluster of 127 mitochondrial proteins was also higher in men compared with women (Scalzo et al., 2014). In our study published in Experimental Physiology (Skelly et al., 2017), we hypothesized that the sex-specific responses suggested by Scalzo et al. (2014) could potentially be explained by a blunted increase in post-exercise mitochondrial gene expression in women compared with men. We measured the mRNA expression of genes involved in mitochondrial biogenesis, including PGC-1α (PPARGC1A), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta (PPARD), PGC-1α-related coactivator (PPRC1) and sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), in response to a single session of SIT in sedentary men and in women who were studied in the follicular phase of their menstrual cycles. Sprint interval training increased the expression of mitochondrial genes after 3 h of recovery compared with pre-exercise, but there were no differences between sexes (Skelly et al., 2017). The findings from our acute study were therefore in contrast to the greater rate of MitoPS observed after training in men compared with women reported by Scalzo et al. (2014). There are several potential explanations for this discrepancy, including the possibility that acute changes in gene expression do not necessarily predict training-induced changes in protein content. Another possibility is that we missed potential sex-based differences in the acute response of mitochondrial gene expression because the single muscle biopsy sampling time point of 3 h post-exercise limited our temporal resolution. It is also possible that women might demonstrate blunted rates of both MitoPS and mitochondrial protein breakdown during short-term SIT, resulting in comparable net changes in mitochondrial content compared with men. Indeed, SIT-induced increases in the protein content of citrate synthase were similar between sexes (Scalzo et al., 2014). Furthermore, it is unknown whether the enhanced MitoPS rates observed in the group of men studied by Scalzo et al. (2014) are present at rest or are primarily related to SIT. Surprisingly, there are a limited number of human sex-based comparisons of basal MitoPS rates in the literature. Cardinale et al. (2018) recognized that despite investigations into the effect of sex on exercise-induced responses (e.g. Scalzo et al., 2014; Skelly et al., 2017), little was known regarding human basal sex-based differences in mitochondrial bioenergetics. Using high-resolution respirometry, the authors demonstrated greater mitochondrial respiration and a lower oxygen affinity, measured as the oxygen tension at 50% of maximal mitochondrial respiration, in isolated mitochondria obtained from women, compared with men who had similar peak aerobic capacity. Maximal mass-specific mitochondrial respiration did not differ between sexes, which is consistent with two other recent reports using permeabilized fibres (Miotto, McGlory, Holloway, Phillips, & Holloway, 2018; Montero, Madsen, Meinild-Lundby, Edin, & Lundby, 2018). The greater intrinsic mitochondrial respiration yet similar mass-specific mitochondrial respiration in women observed by Cardinale et al. (2018) implies that women also had lower mitochondrial content compared with men. However, in the two recent studies, mitochondrial content, assessed using transmission electron microscopy to determine mitochondrial volume (Montero et al., 2018) and Western blotting to determine mitochondrial protein content (Miotto et al., 2018), was higher or similar, respectively, in women compared with men. The conflicting findings might be related to the different methods used to assess content, and highlight an interesting area for continued research. An important consideration in studies of potential sex-based differences is the influence of training status. When closely matched for peak oxygen uptake () relative to kilograms of body mass, women typically have a greater training status owing to a higher proportion of body fat compared with men. Indeed, in the study by Cardinale et al. (2018), the group of women who displayed greater intrinsic mitochondrial respiration compared with men exercised more often (three to four versus two to three sessions per week) and had more experience competing in endurance events, despite having similar (∼50 ml kg−1 min−1). To address the potential influence of training status, the authors also measured mitochondrial function in a group of endurance-trained men with higher (∼67 ml kg−1 min−1) and training history (seven to nine sessions per week). The more well-trained men displayed intrinsic mitochondrial respiration similar to the less well-trained women and higher than the less well-trained men (Cardinale et al., 2018). Together, these findings demonstrate that both training status and sex influence intrinsic mitochondrial respiration. Future research should match men and women for relative to kilograms of fat free mass to account for differences in body composition and training backgrounds. Variability in circulating sex hormones between and within female participants can also influence sex-based comparisons, although this potential confounding factor is often not controlled for in experimental designs. Concentrations of endogenous estradiol and progesterone fluctuate over a naturally occurring menstrual cycle and are suppressed in females using oral contraceptives. It might be worthwhile for researchers examining sex-specific responses to short-term (∼2-wk) exercise interventions to conduct the exercise training within a single menstrual cycle phase (follicular or luteal) in non-oral contraceptive users or within a constant-hormone phase in women using monophasic oral contraceptives. Longer-term exercise interventions could standardize fluctuations in the sex-hormone milieu better by adjusting the length of the intervention to cover a single or multiple complete menstrual cycle(s). Although the effect of menstrual cycle phase on exercise metabolism is likely to be much smaller compared with the effect of sex, these efforts might help to increase the reproducibility of findings and/or limit false conclusions regarding sex-based differences. In summary, the aforementioned studies highlight the potential influence of sex on mitochondrial bioenergetics in humans. Future research should compare exercise-induced changes in mitochondrial respiration and mitochondrial fission and fusion proteins in men and women. Continued investigations into sex-based differences in metabolism at rest and after exercise will expand our understanding of basic human physiology and the regulation of skeletal muscle adaptations. The findings might also provide crucial information for optimizing exercise strategies aimed at improving health in both sexes. We regret our inability to cite all relevant articles owing to space restrictions. None declared.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,093
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,624

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,242
Écart entre enseignants0,237 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2019
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueExperimental PhysiologyMême sujetMuscle metabolism and nutritionTravaux en français237 207