O7.1. ABNORMAL DEVELOPMENT, FAULTY MATURATION OR ACCELERATED AGING? “WHITE MATTER AT THE CENTER STAGE OF SCHIZOPHRENIA” REVISITED
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Evidence for age related brain white matter (WM) abnormalities in schizophrenia (SZ) has been observed using MRI, and interpreted by various studies as reflecting either developmental, maturational and/or degenerative pathology. Such conflicting findings, mostly due to lack of longitudinal data and statistical power, have hindered consensus on patterns and trajectories of brain dysfunction in SZ. ‘Big Data’ provides a new and powerful means to identify subtle abnormalities across the course of SZ. We have accumulated and processed, what we believe the biggest, to-date, sample of thoughtfully harmonized diffusion MRI (dMRI) cross sectional data, and performed the study aimed at comprehensively characterizing age-related WM changes (trajectories) through the course of SZ. Our dMRI data comprises a total of 1092 participants, aged between 14 and 65. This includes 600 individuals with SZ at different illness stages (383 males, 217 females, age: 31.3+/- 12) and 492 healthy controls-HC (275 males, 217 females, age: 29.8+/-13), from 13 different sites. Preprocessing and dMRI data harmonization based on the rotation invariant spherical harmonics were used to remove the nonlinear scanner and sequence differences across sites. All harmonized data was registered to a common template. Fractional Anisotropy (FA) for Whole Brain (WB) and 14 individual WM regions of interest (ROIs) were computed using a probabilistic tractography atlas. We modeled FA changes over age by quadratic curves (the best fitted model: highest adjusted r^2) and fitted separately to SZ and HC. Peak age and upper and lower bounds of the model were estimated after 5000 bootstraps. FA% differences were modeled at each age between SZ and HC for WB and each ROI, while sex was treated as a confound. The effect sizes (Cohen’s d) between SZ and HC were also computed at each age. Finally, WM pathologies (i.e. based on between-group differences) were clustered into three groups according to d occurring along trajectory using kmeans. In WB, FA was lower in SZ comparing to HC at each age, but the percentage differences as well as d varied significantly by age (range of %FA change = [1.5 7], d = [.5 1.8]). Also, WB peaks of FA differed between groups, observed at the age of 33 in HC, shifted to the age of 27 in SZ. Three groups emerged from examining the degree of WM pathology across the age trajectories in ROIs, characterized by: 1) .3<d<.5, stable pathology for the entire time course, appearing as a consequence of only early developmental anomalies, e.g. late maturing limbic fibers such as cingulum, %FA change = 3.12+/-.12. 2)d<1.2, gradually progressed pathology with advancing age, displayed abnormally short maturational windows in SZ (with maturational peak shifted), e.g. language association fibers, including the superior longitudinal fasciculus-SLF, range of %FA change = [0 9]. 3).6<d<1.6, strong effects from the outset of illness, pathology progressed with increasing age, e.g. largest interhemispheric connection of the human brain, e.g. Corpus Callosum, range of %FA change =[2 10] for all time course p<.0033. This work provides an initial benchmark for regionally-specific trajectories of WM abnormalities in SZ. Our findings accord with a developmental perspective, suggesting that widely distributed WM deficits emerge early or display perturbed maturation. In addition, it appears that the callosal and long-range association fibers undergo accelerated aging processes. This regional diversity could explain the heterogeneity encountered across previous dMRI studies and suggests that WM pathology in SZ dynamically interacts with maturation and aging processes and manifests itself in regionally-specific brain areas at different ages and disease stages.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».