MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2936516877

Evaluation of soil bacteria as bioinoculants for the control of field pea root rot caused by Aphanomyces euteiches

2019· dissertation· en· W2936516877 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ashebir T. Godebo

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiquePlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRoot rotRoot (linguistics)BiologyHorticultureBotanyAgronomy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Aphanomyces euteiches is an oomycete pathogen that is becoming a serious problem for field pea (Pisum sativum L) production in western Canada. The pathogen causes severe rot in the root, cortex, and epicotyl of field pea resulting in stunting, yellow and wilting leaves, or plant death. Aphanomyces root rot develops because of zoosporic or myceliogenic infection when oospores germinate to form germ sporangia and germ tubes, respectively. Until the recent introduction of the fungicide INTEGOTM Solo (ethaboxam) and Vibrance® Maxx RFC, there was no fungicide available in Canada that effectively suppresses or controls aphanomyces root rot in field pea. Additional control measures are needed, and one addition to chemical control is the development of bacterial inoculants that interrupt the pathogen’s lifecycle and ultimately control or reduces disease expression in the host plant. This study comprised laboratory studies aimed at isolating and identifying antagonistic bacteria against A. euteiches mycelia and zoospore growth stages, and growth chamber trials that examined efficacy of antagonistic bacteria as biocontrol agents against aphanomyces root rot in field pea. Soils were collected from 43 commercial field pea fields across Saskatchewan. Initial screening of antagonistic bacteria was completed by assessing mycelia growth inhibition of A. euteiches in vitro. Growth inhibition of each antagonistic bacterium was further evaluated using a dual plate assay technique where single colonies of the antagonistic bacterial isolates were inoculated at two opposite edges on a PDA plate and a plug of A. euteiches mycelia was placed in the center of the plate. Additionally, a preliminary screening assay utilizing a dual plate technique was employed to assess 170 bacterial isolates for biocontrol activity against A. euteiches. These 170 bacterial isolates were from a previously existing bacteria culture collection of roots associated rhizobacteria from a variety of field crops. The antagonistic bacterial isolates were also assayed for in vitro zoospore germination inhibition. A total of 184 antagonistic bacteria, of which 22 were from a previously existing bacteria culture collection, that inhibited the mycelia stage of A. euteiches were identified using the initial screening assay. Of these, 47 inhibited zoospore germination by 75% or more compared to a control assay plate. The mean mycelial growth inhibition potential of the isolates ranged from 1 mm to 12 mm whereas the mean zoospore germination inhibition potential of the isolates ranged from 0 to 100 %. Based on 16S rDNA gene sequencing, the antagonistic bacterial isolates were placed into 18 different genera with Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Paenibacillus, Lysobacter and Streptomyces being the top five containing 45, 32, 29,17 and 12 antagonistic bacterial isolates, respectively. Bacterial isolates that inhibited mycelia growth and zoospore germination by 75% or more were selected for further evaluation in growth chamber trials. In the first set of experiments (Trial 1) pea plants were grown in vermiculite and inoculated with antagonistic bacterial suspensions and A. euteiches zoospores. Four weeks after planting, the pea plants were harvested, and roots assessed for level of disease development. Isolates which significantly suppressed aphanomyces root rot in vermiculite were further evaluated as soil inoculants in pot experiments using non-sterile field soil (Trial 2). Screening of 47 antagonistic bacteria as bioinoculants in growth chamber Trial 1 identified 29 that significantly (α = 0.05) suppressed or reduced aphanomyces root rot in field pea. Of these, 20 isolates were selected and screened as soil inoculants in a second set of experiments (Trial 2) and three isolates produced the highest biocontrol activity and significantly (α = 0.05) suppressed or reduced aphanomyces root rot in field pea. From the findings of this research, it can be concluded that the A. euteiches lifecycle can be interrupted using rhizosphere bacteria and hence these bacterial isolates may be used as biocontrol agents to suppress or reduce aphanomyces root rot in field pea. Variations of inhibition potential among isolates suggests that the mechanisms by which biocontrol is achieved such as the production and secretion of inhibitory compounds and/or the mode of action exerted by the inhibitory metabolites likely varies among isolates. The results of this research indicate the potential promise for the development of microbial biocontrol agents. Further studies aimed at assessing the efficacy of the promising isolates under field conditions in Saskatchewan and other manipulative studies that would maximize biocontrol potential and their effective utilization are a necessary next step.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,012
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,024

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,280
Écart entre enseignants0,251 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity→Travaux en français237 207→