Impact of Omitting Prophylactic Antibiotics, to Preserve Gut Microbiota, on the Incidence of Bacteraemia during the Pre-Engraftment Period of Allogenic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction Prophylactic antibiotic (ATB) administration has been shown to reduce febrile episodes and infections in neutropenic patients undergoing high dose chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in large meta-analyses (Gafter-Gvili, Cochrane, 2012; Kimura, J Infect Dis, 2014). This practice is supported by current guidelines in high-risk patients including those undergoing HSCT. However, ATB use has also been associated with adverse outcomes such as decreased microbiota diversity (Taur, Blood, 2014) and increased resistance (Magesic, Transpl Inf Dis, 2014). Recently, our group participated in a multicenter retrospective cohort of patients undergoing allogeneic (a) HSCT that demonstrated an increased incidence of acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) and lower overall survival in patients receiving antibioprophylaxis (Routy, Oncoimmunology, 2017). To assess the impact of omitting prophylactic ATB, we used the sample from one of the participating centers (Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont) to compare the incidence of bacteraemia and mortality in aHSCT patients who received prophylactic ATB during the pre-engraftment period to those who did not. Methods This retrospective study included patients undergoing aHSCT for hematological malignancy between January 2005 and December 2012 at our center. Exclusion criteria were prior aHSCT, syngenic and haploidentical HSCT. Antibioprophylaxis with fluoroquinolones or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX)was administered at initiation of the conditioning regimen in patients receiving a myeloablative (MA) and reduced intensity conditioning regimen and discontinued after engraftment. It was omitted in patients with fluoroquinolone or penicillin allergy and in patients receiving a non-myeloablative regimen. Prophylactic ATB were substituted for therapeutic ATB during episodes of febrile neutropenia and documented infection. Bacteraemia occurring during the pre-engraftment period (30 days or less after stem cell infusion) were recorded. Results A total of 377 patients were included, of which 182 (48%) received prophylactic ATB and 195 (52%) did not. In the ATB group, 141 patients received ciprofloxacin, 17 moxifloxacin and 24 TMP-SMX. Baseline characteristics differed in both groups. The ATB group had a younger mean age with 45.2 ±12.3 years compared to 49.5 ±11.3 years (p<0.001) and a higher intensity conditioning regimen with 74% receiving a MA regimen compared with 36% (p<0.001). The incidence of bacteraemia was similar in both groups with 14.3% (95% CI 9.2-19.4%) in those receiving prophylactic ATB compared to 12.3% (95% CI 7.7-17.0%) in those who did not (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.7-2.2, p 0.57). Expectedly, gram negative bacteremia was less likely (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.84, p 0.026) in the ATB group, representing 11.5% of all bacteraemia compared to 52.2%. The incidence of bacteraemia was also reduced by prophylactic ATB in patients receiving a MA conditioning regimen (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.25-0.96, p 0.036). There was no mortality associated to infectious causes during the pre-engraftment period in either group. Two patients died during the pre-engraftment period, one from hepatic failure and the other from acute respiratory distress syndrome in the context of veno-occlusive disease. Both were in the group that did not receive prophylactic ATB and received MA conditioning. Discussion In this study, the omission of prophylactic ATB did not increase the incidence of bacteraemia in patients undergoing aHSCT. However, the administration of prophylactic ATB did reduce bacteremia in those receiving MA conditioning regimens, as well as gram negative bacteraemia in all patients. Nevertheless, there was no impact on treatment related mortality at day 30 after stem cell infusion. Thus, the benefit of prophylactic ATB must be weighed against the higher risk of aGVHD and shorter overall survival observed in this sample in earlier studies (Routy, Oncoimmunology, 2017) and with the potential risk of selection and resistance. The limitations of this study include its retrospective design, the heterogenicity between the two groups and its omission of febrile episodes and infections without bacteraemia. Further data, preferably from a large prospective, randomised trial, would be useful to reassess the benefits and risks of prophylactic antibiotics in aHSCT. Disclosures Lachance: ExCellThera: Patents & Royalties: Royalities from sales of UM171.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».